JazzHR

Possibility for hiring managers to evaluate and stage their own applicants according to their needs. Depending on the role, the work processes can be modified. New job listings are simple to make, and their cooperation with free job boards is particularly beneficial to building pipelines on a budget.

When switched from LinkedIn Recruiter to JazzHR, it doesn't always function. Since we frequently divide candidates into multiple groups, I believe that using a variety of rating systems would be advantageous.

The system is very inexpensive and much better than having not ATS.
-It posts to several free job boards with only one click.
-Store, track, and update all applications in one place.
-You can communicate with applicants through the system.
-You can leave comments and keep record of multiple applications for an applicant.
-You can send emails in bulk.

Compared to other ATS in the same price rang and has a ton more (useless) features and is missing some key basic features.
-The reports features are very complicated and not very practical
-The screening and interview features are not realistic in our environment
-Missing basic features like automatic replies when changing status
-Admin does not have control over who has access to what. You can set users up by predefined positions such as "super user" but you can't tailor what a "super user" is.
-The sales, customer service etc. have obviously never been involved in hiring
-They ask for feedback but only interested in the feedback they want to hear on useless features that do not aid in hiring.
-Calendar feature does not sync with all versions of outlook making it completely useless
-The design features and look are horrible
-To post on paid sites you must save credit card information that all Admins have access too.