Bitbucket

Bitbucket es la solución de Git para equipos profesionales.

Calificación general

4,6 /5
(1.236)
Relación calidad-precio
4,5/5
Funcionalidades
4,5/5
Facilidad de uso
4,4/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,3/5

94%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

1236 opiniones

perla
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

todo el control de mis repositorios

Revisado el 8/7/2021

No hemos tenido inconvenientes con esta herramienta, siempre tenemos todo respaldado y el control de permisos para los usuarios ayuda mucho para que solo los administradores puedan hacer ciertas acciones de mas cuidado

Puntos a favor

bitbucket es super facil de administrar, nos dedicamos a el desarrollo de software y es basico tener una herramienta para el control de cambios de nuestros scripts, todo lo trabajamos con git y bitbucket es el mejor repositorio que hemos enocntrado para lograr la buena administracion

Desventajas

No hemos tenido inconvenientes con esta herramienta, siempre tenemos todo respaldado y el control de permisos para los usuarios ayuda mucho para que solo los administradores puedan hacer ciertas acciones de mas cuidado

Danilo
Calificación general
  • Sector: Comercio minorista
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

La mejor alternativa a GitHub con rollback a solo unos cuantos clics

Revisado el 30/5/2022

Puntos a favor

Muy integrable con otros herramientas, tales como gestores de proyectos, soluciones de comunicación de equipo.

Desventajas

Sólo posee cliente Windows y Mac, no posee soporte oficial para Linux.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Automatización industrial
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Una alternativa menos conocida para gestionar tus repositorios

Revisado el 18/12/2022

Mi experiencia con Bitbucket es buena. Tengo unos cuantos repositorios para poder estar al día con esta herramienta.

Puntos a favor

Lo que mas me gusta es su aplicacion de escritorio para Windows. Puedes gestionar tus repositorios de forma visual.

Desventajas

En general está bien la herramienta, pero si tengo que mencionar algo sería tener más integraciones con otras herraminetas.

Alternativas consideradas

GitLab

Software anterior

GitHub
Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Ingeniería industrial o mecánica
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Gestion de codigo para proyectos personales

Revisado el 22/11/2022

Puntos a favor

Dentro de la red atalasian, buena aplicacion de escritorio para los que no nos manejamos con la cmd

Desventajas

Repositorios privados, gestion de projectos a traves de trello no en el propio entorno

Carlos
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Un gestor de código

Revisado el 26/5/2022

En general es agradable y recomiendo su uso.

Puntos a favor

Basado en Git, bitbucket permite mergear o generar pull request y hacer seguimiento de versiones de manera sencilla.

Desventajas

Al ser entorno visual, algunas acciones son más lentas que si usasemos la consola de comandos de Git.

Luis Daniel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

A good free alternative to github

Revisado el 24/12/2019

I've been using it now for 6 years and it's my main repo host for work. I can recall only two times where there was a downtime that affected me, but besides that, there's never been a problem with them.

Puntos a favor

I like how robust their website is on terms of pull requests and integrations with JIRA and other atlassian products. You can store private repo's and manage it. The pull Request feature is the strongest in my opinion, with reviews and linking to JIRA. So it automatically can close tickets once you merge/accept a pull request. If you link the commits with a JIRA issue it also updates with them. They recently simplified the UI and their own home made SourceTree Visual App has received some substantial upgrades over the years and it's one of the best tree-based git history apps out there. In all honesty, it's a simple git control hosting website you can use online or host by yourself. It's really good.

Desventajas

The UI used to change a lot but now they've settled. Sometimes, compared to github, processing big pull requests (loading the changes/previewing) can be a little slow. Sometimes the integrations with JIRA, can feel like a miss if you don't use it, because Github has a lot of those features that Github might miss.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

More robust enterprise tools and competitive pricing. Also private local hosting.
Giovanni
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

An easy and fast way to keep track of your elements and their modifications.

Revisado el 13/2/2021

Bitbucket is a very useful version control tool, easy to master and with many useful tools that will help you speed up your work, of course it has certain shortcomings that could be improved over time, but at the end of the day it is a tool very useful.
From the most basic to the most complex options, you will find them extremely useful in your day to day work to get ahead.

Puntos a favor

Bitbucket has a very friendly interface that is easy to understand and understand, it allows you to maintain control and order of all your elements and keep track of each modification that was made and by whom said modification was made.
It allows you to establish different types of permissions as necessary to have a better control of who can perform what actions within the repositories that are created in bitbucket.
Once you get familiar with the tool, everything is easy to do and locate any option you are looking for to carry out your tasks.

Desventajas

Sometimes the way it provides you to search within each repository can be somewhat cumbersome, requiring you to write the exact name of the component you may be looking for in order to show you a result, making the searches more strenuous since you must know the exact name of the component or it will be very difficult to find it.
In some cases, when versioning certain changes, Bitbucket interprets them as a total change within the component and shows as if the file was being completely modified even if you are only modifying some lines of code.

Rajan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios de información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

A Robust Platform for Code Collaboration and Management

Revisado el 6/2/2023

Bitbucket is a widely used version control platform that provides a comprehensive set of features for managing code changes, including support for both Git and Mercurial version control systems, a user-friendly graphical interface, integration with popular CI/CD tools, code review and pull request features, and deployment management capabilities. Many teams find Bitbucket to be a useful tool for collaborating on code changes and managing their codebase.

Puntos a favor

Bitbucket include its support for both Git and Mercurial version control systems, its user-friendly graphical interface, its integration with popular CI/CD tools, its code review and pull request features, and its deployment management capabilities.

Desventajas

On Bitbucket, limitations on the free plan, limited scalability for large enterprises, and limited support for some of the latest technologies and tools. Additionally, some users may prefer other version control platforms over Bitbucket based on their specific needs and requirements.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub
Adrian
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 0.0 /10

Started as a great product, but I got disappointed

Revisado el 8/1/2020

Brilliant from 7 years go until approx 3 years ago. Painful to use for the last 3 years and we are currently migrating everything to GitHub.

Puntos a favor

We started implementing version control using Mercurial about 7 years ago (in my own company). On the advice of a colleague at the time we used Mercurial as opposed to Git. Bitbucket worked perfectly with Mercurial when we needed it at the time and really helped our business. It was fast easy to use and understand and the online UI kept getting better and better.

Desventajas

In the last 3 years, pushing and pulling and doing any kind of actions became tediously slow. I copied some of the repos to GitHub and converted to Git to check it was not a problem with my repo, with my computer, or with the software I was using (SourceTree). In all cases the only difference was using a Mercurial versus Git repo on BitBucket. I got no response to my support query, and no response to a forum post as to the issue and when it would be fixed. I then made a decision for our entire company to move all of it's repos to GitHub and stop using BitBucket - we are doing this right now. Approx 1 year after the decision was made, BitBucket emailed all it's customers to say they would be discontinuing support for Mercurial as not enough of their customer base used it. However there was no suggestion of helping migrate all repos to Git, no support docs on how to do this and honestly this was too little too late for us. We had become so annoyed with BitBucket that we would have migrated regardless.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

At the time, BitBucket offered a free option to companies < 5 users
Samiran
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Best in Class Jira Integration - Use once and you'll forget everything else.

Revisado el 10/12/2022

We use bitbucket and other atlassian products in our office for managing code and other projects for our team. We must say that its integration with JIRA and its continuous development and deployment are the best things our corporate people likes the most. Thanks

Puntos a favor

In-expensive, Pro-output, World Class Integration, CI/CD, Cloud Security.

Desventajas

The dashboard could be improved a little more where basically all project pull request are retained by adding some more filters.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub y Microsoft Azure

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

Inexpensive, Best in class integration and delivery, better output in comparision
Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Version control and deployment is made easier..

Revisado el 16/2/2023

Very happy with the overall performance of the application starting from creating repositories, adding permissions, version control to deployment automation

Puntos a favor

Checking in the source code everyday helps save all the work from being erased accidentally. Also multiple people can work on shared code and still merge the changes when required. Deployments can be automated integrating bitbucket with jenkins and has been very helpful with triggered deployment builds

Desventajas

It is not possible to get back a deleted repository which is trouble incase it is accidentally deleted. Also a branch created does not show where it is created from directly which sometimes creates confusion

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Investigación
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Incredible Tool!

Revisado el 21/1/2023

Puntos a favor

I like that Bitbucket is a cloud-based version control system that makes it easy to store, manage, and track changes to code and other files. It also provides an intuitive web-based user interface, so it's easy to navigate and use, even for those who are unfamiliar with version control systems.

Desventajas

Not much to dislike. Its a perfect tool that can be used as a version control system for your needs

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Good tool for Source code management

Revisado el 4/3/2023

Overall, Bitbucket is an excellent solution for those who are looking for an efficient and effective way to manage their code repositories and collaborate with their teams.

Puntos a favor

It is a web-based hosting service a platform for code repository management. It offers a range of powerful features such as code review tools, support for Git and Mercurial version control systems, and built-in continuous integration and deployment pipelines. It also seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Confluence.

Desventajas

It could also benefit from better performance for large repositories, improved support for third-party integrations, and more robust user permissions management. Additionally, better documentation and tutorials would help new users get up to speed quickly.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Minería y metalurgia
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Bitbucket Review

Revisado el 16/2/2023

I used Bitbucket for over a year for application development, continuous integration, integrated development environment (IDE), and source code management, and overall, I found it to be an excellent tool for team collaboration.

Puntos a favor

The most pleasing aspect of Bitbucket is how easy it is to collaborate with other team members. The code merging process is smooth and easy to understand, which is essential for ensuring quality development. Additionally, I appreciated the ability to create private repositories to securely store my source code.

Desventajas

One negative aspect I encountered is the lack of user interface customization. While the interface is clear and easy to use, it doesn't offer much flexibility in terms of customization, which can make the user experience a bit dull in the long term.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Comercio minorista
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

A Solid Standard for Enterprise Git

Revisado el 17/2/2023

I've used it for pushing code and merging, it has been very easy to use.

Puntos a favor

It is intuitive and easy to use/configure for source control.

Desventajas

Doesn't have much capability outside source control.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Simple SCM Tool

Revisado el 9/11/2022

Overall Bitbucket is good, earlier I used to perform all my changes in code using Bitbucket only. The best part is Bitbucket allows to integrate with JIRA and confluence so that we can easily track the progress of work.if you are a beginner I would really suggest you to go through with Bitbucket without a single thought. Bitbucket is only a source code management tool but GitHub performs as source code management as well as CI tool so for experienced person/user, Bitbucket will not do everything. I used Bitbucket more than 2 years and I can say my overall experience is good with Bitbucket, its up to users what features they want accordingly they can choose.

Puntos a favor

Bitbucket is a good version control system, one can easily create branches, delete branches, commit code, merge code and many more. For a beginner it's a good tool to learn about git and to do practice. The advantage of Bitbucket is you can integrate it with project management tools such as JIRA, also you integrate Bitbucket with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins that is the most likeable feature of Bitbucket. Bitbucket is free for single user, so one can do practice easily during learning phase.

Desventajas

Prices are bit high for paid version, Bitbucket provide free version to only <=5 employees, for companies with more than five employees Bitbucket does not provide free service. Also Bitbucket features are outdated as compare to GitHub, GitHub provides lot of extra features as compare to Bitbucket. Sometimes while switching from one section to other Bitbucket was slow.

Simone
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Our Git and CI/CD environment of choice

Revisado el 5/8/2022

Bitbucket is in charge of most of our Git repositories, and we barely had a problem in 10 years. Recommended.

Puntos a favor

The product is quite easy to use, tough user and project management on different projects can be a little confusing. Widely used and integrated with a lot of external services. I especially liked the seamless integration with Vercel to publish NexstJs projects without any problem - usually quite hard to configure. Free tier gives you a lot of space and options, nobody else does.

Desventajas

Account management could be improved. The border between free tier and payment version is not always easy to understand.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub y GitLab

Software anterior

GitLab

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

Free tier gives you more options and space. Paying options still very competitive.
Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Market leading product by Atlassian

Revisado el 30/7/2019

Overall Bitbucket is a great platform for professional developers for personal and commercial use.

Puntos a favor

I have been using Bitbucket (personally and commercially) for couple of years and I'm really satisfied with the services and features that they offer. Letting free users create unlimited repos and allowing up to five users is a good way to go, which attracts more users. Pull requests helps to get code reviewed by experts and get them approve before it available for others and helps to maintain quality code leading to quality software. More useful features like Pipeline lets user to deploy/release more often.

Desventajas

As a market leader, pricing plans can be adjusted to attract more

Alternativas consideradas

Targetprocess

Razones para elegir Bitbucket

Taiga is a very basic product with very less features

Software anterior

Taiga

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

More flexible
Tulga
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

We use Bitbucket for our small team

Revisado el 10/12/2020

First of all we keep track of over 100 project source codes with bitbucket, it has no limit. WIth two teams of 5 developers, we are using bitbucket for free with all the features we need. It does it's job good enough.

Puntos a favor

First of all it is free for small team. For bigger teams it has really reasonable prize. I personally love and prefer Atlassian's products such as Bitbucket, Trello. The Atlassian team behind the product continuously improves their products. Since I started using Bitbucket 5 years ago, they added many features. It has no limitation and pretty good integration with trello, jira and other project management products.

Desventajas

Fortunately, during the last 5 years we didn't face any difficulties using Bitbucket. It works pretty well with my team. But keep-in mind that free version is only for 5 developers for a team.

Sushant
Calificación general
  • Sector: Administración educativa
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Easily manage multiple private projects within a team

Revisado el 4/6/2022

Overall I'm pretty satisfied with Bitbucket. Once again I'd like to highlight the fact that giving private repositories was a blessing for early-stage startups who keeps an eye on every $$ spent. The integrations with products like JIRA just make it an excellent choice over any other competitor products.

Puntos a favor

I liked the option of creating private repositories for free in Bitbucket. Github has also started giving this now but Bitbucket is a pioneer in this. The team collaboration is excellent having complete visibility of individuals. JIRA integration is also very powerful. Developers can easily mark the task completed from one place itself.

Desventajas

Small things like solving merge conflicts from the UI would help senior engineers not to go through the IDE. It also gets slow at a certain point. It takes a lot of time in merging the conflicts.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

At that time, Bitbucket was providing private repositories for free whereas GitHub was charging $$.
Rishad
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

One of the best version control tool

Revisado el 14/10/2022

We're using Bitbucket for more than 8 years. We selected bitbucket because it has free plans and supports private repo with the free plans. Once the company started growing, we purchased paid plan because it has additional features like rule & permission settings. It is very important with a larger team.
Another important thing we liked is the integration with Jira. Software tester can report issues to Jira, and the development team can create a new branch for fixing/creating issues/features.

Puntos a favor

Easy to integrate with existing projects. Because it is based on the git version control system. So no bitbucket-specific tool is required. This makes it easier to set up a development system.

Desventajas

Sometimes, we experienced issues when creating PR. This is usually due to their server issue. But they inform the status by mail (if we subscribed)

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub y GitLab

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

it has free plans and supports private repo with the free plans
Jander
Calificación general
  • Sector: Juegos de ordenador
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Complete solution for code versioning

Revisado el 31/12/2019

With Bitbucket I have the security of keeping my project versioned and with that I can develop without fear. Sharing with team members makes the process simple and efficient.

Puntos a favor

With Bitbucket I can have many private projects and all Git features. I can create project teams by assigning different permissions to each one. The ability to view code in the web interface itself allows for quick checks. You can also check the differences of each commit. Integration with SourceTree is a breeze.

Desventajas

If you use the tool with the default flow, you will have no problems. However, in some situations it is a little difficult to correct. I already had problems that the tool claimed problems in login while all the information was correct.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para elegir Bitbucket

I need private projects.

Software anterior

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

I need private projects and the possibility of testing without having to pay for it at the beginning.
Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Electrónica de consumo
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Straight forward

Revisado el 19/8/2020

We needed an hassle free GIT cloud solutions that just works and that's what we've got with Bitbucket.

Puntos a favor

Intuitively and ease for settings and tweaking. When we have a new team member, 15 seconds are needed to add it and voila he's good to go. The projects itself are enough complicated so we don't need more complications from our tools.

Desventajas

Keep things and menus as simple and clean as possible. Power users will find a ways for their needs even if their menu are a little beep hidden / deeper than expected.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

The price point is easy and scale very well for a startup like ours. We are clearly low on budget so any small difference in price and time spend on a product ends up being a huge difference between closing the shop or keeping it open.
Silviu
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Bitbucket has been the first choice for me for a couple of years.

Revisado el 21/12/2019

Bitbucket has always been trustworthy. The product is stable, with no major flaws. They have great documentation and customer support.

Puntos a favor

The free plan is great a small development studio or freelancers. It offers unlimited private repos with up to 5 users. The private plans are better than what Github has to offer, at least for small teams. Great Trello and Jira integration. It is still a privately owned company.

Desventajas

Bitbucket has less adaptation than the main competitor Gitbub, due to the open-source community. That sometimes is a downside when collaborating with external entities.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

When I started using Bitbucket, Github didn't offer any free private repositories.
Usman
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Great tool, automation docs could be better

Revisado el 14/1/2020

Once you get the hang of Bitbucket, it is easy to use and a very good visualizing tool for what you are doing with your repositories.

Puntos a favor

Bitbucket has a good UI and is very good for most of the repository related tasks. It has JIRA integration, so if you put your JIRA ticket numbers in the commit message, Bitbucket will link the pull requests into JIRA. This makes it very easy to access commits and the associated JIRA tickets from bitbucket itself, and vice versa.

It has good branch visualization tools. It lets you select branches from a drop down and compare them with other source barnches. The diff visualizer is pretty good too. It even has good graphical icons to show which branches have been merged/rebased where.

You can use command line git to manage repos as well. With their REST APIs it is possible to create repositories from the command line, which is very useful in cases where you have to do the tedious task of creating hundreds of repositories very similar to one another.

Desventajas

I was unable to find documentation on their APIs to set group and permissions access restrictions from the command line. This was required because we needed to create 100s of repos and allow our users to access them. Because we could not find API documentation easily and were in a time crunch, we had to have developers spend several days manually granting permissions using the web-console. Bitbucket should have these APIs clearly visible and documented.

Alternativas consideradas

GitHub

Razones para cambiar a Bitbucket

Price per user and overall price.