Opiniones de Bitbucket

bitbucket es super facil de administrar, nos dedicamos a el desarrollo de software y es basico tener una herramienta para el control de cambios de nuestros scripts, todo lo trabajamos con git y bitbucket es el mejor repositorio que hemos enocntrado para lograr la buena administracion

No hemos tenido inconvenientes con esta herramienta, siempre tenemos todo respaldado y el control de permisos para los usuarios ayuda mucho para que solo los administradores puedan hacer ciertas acciones de mas cuidado

Muy integrable con otros herramientas, tales como gestores de proyectos, soluciones de comunicación de equipo.

Sólo posee cliente Windows y Mac, no posee soporte oficial para Linux.

Lo que mas me gusta es su aplicacion de escritorio para Windows. Puedes gestionar tus repositorios de forma visual.

En general está bien la herramienta, pero si tengo que mencionar algo sería tener más integraciones con otras herraminetas.

Dentro de la red atalasian, buena aplicacion de escritorio para los que no nos manejamos con la cmd

Repositorios privados, gestion de projectos a traves de trello no en el propio entorno

Basado en Git, bitbucket permite mergear o generar pull request y hacer seguimiento de versiones de manera sencilla.

Al ser entorno visual, algunas acciones son más lentas que si usasemos la consola de comandos de Git.

I like how robust their website is on terms of pull requests and integrations with JIRA and other atlassian products. You can store private repo's and manage it. The pull Request feature is the strongest in my opinion, with reviews and linking to JIRA. So it automatically can close tickets once you merge/accept a pull request. If you link the commits with a JIRA issue it also updates with them. They recently simplified the UI and their own home made SourceTree Visual App has received some substantial upgrades over the years and it's one of the best tree-based git history apps out there. In all honesty, it's a simple git control hosting website you can use online or host by yourself. It's really good.

The UI used to change a lot but now they've settled. Sometimes, compared to github, processing big pull requests (loading the changes/previewing) can be a little slow. Sometimes the integrations with JIRA, can feel like a miss if you don't use it, because Github has a lot of those features that Github might miss.

Bitbucket has a very friendly interface that is easy to understand and understand, it allows you to maintain control and order of all your elements and keep track of each modification that was made and by whom said modification was made.
It allows you to establish different types of permissions as necessary to have a better control of who can perform what actions within the repositories that are created in bitbucket.
Once you get familiar with the tool, everything is easy to do and locate any option you are looking for to carry out your tasks.

Sometimes the way it provides you to search within each repository can be somewhat cumbersome, requiring you to write the exact name of the component you may be looking for in order to show you a result, making the searches more strenuous since you must know the exact name of the component or it will be very difficult to find it.
In some cases, when versioning certain changes, Bitbucket interprets them as a total change within the component and shows as if the file was being completely modified even if you are only modifying some lines of code.

Bitbucket include its support for both Git and Mercurial version control systems, its user-friendly graphical interface, its integration with popular CI/CD tools, its code review and pull request features, and its deployment management capabilities.

On Bitbucket, limitations on the free plan, limited scalability for large enterprises, and limited support for some of the latest technologies and tools. Additionally, some users may prefer other version control platforms over Bitbucket based on their specific needs and requirements.

We started implementing version control using Mercurial about 7 years ago (in my own company). On the advice of a colleague at the time we used Mercurial as opposed to Git. Bitbucket worked perfectly with Mercurial when we needed it at the time and really helped our business. It was fast easy to use and understand and the online UI kept getting better and better.

In the last 3 years, pushing and pulling and doing any kind of actions became tediously slow. I copied some of the repos to GitHub and converted to Git to check it was not a problem with my repo, with my computer, or with the software I was using (SourceTree). In all cases the only difference was using a Mercurial versus Git repo on BitBucket. I got no response to my support query, and no response to a forum post as to the issue and when it would be fixed. I then made a decision for our entire company to move all of it's repos to GitHub and stop using BitBucket - we are doing this right now. Approx 1 year after the decision was made, BitBucket emailed all it's customers to say they would be discontinuing support for Mercurial as not enough of their customer base used it. However there was no suggestion of helping migrate all repos to Git, no support docs on how to do this and honestly this was too little too late for us. We had become so annoyed with BitBucket that we would have migrated regardless.

In-expensive, Pro-output, World Class Integration, CI/CD, Cloud Security.

The dashboard could be improved a little more where basically all project pull request are retained by adding some more filters.

Checking in the source code everyday helps save all the work from being erased accidentally. Also multiple people can work on shared code and still merge the changes when required. Deployments can be automated integrating bitbucket with jenkins and has been very helpful with triggered deployment builds

It is not possible to get back a deleted repository which is trouble incase it is accidentally deleted. Also a branch created does not show where it is created from directly which sometimes creates confusion

I like that Bitbucket is a cloud-based version control system that makes it easy to store, manage, and track changes to code and other files. It also provides an intuitive web-based user interface, so it's easy to navigate and use, even for those who are unfamiliar with version control systems.

Not much to dislike. Its a perfect tool that can be used as a version control system for your needs

It is a web-based hosting service a platform for code repository management. It offers a range of powerful features such as code review tools, support for Git and Mercurial version control systems, and built-in continuous integration and deployment pipelines. It also seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Confluence.

It could also benefit from better performance for large repositories, improved support for third-party integrations, and more robust user permissions management. Additionally, better documentation and tutorials would help new users get up to speed quickly.

The most pleasing aspect of Bitbucket is how easy it is to collaborate with other team members. The code merging process is smooth and easy to understand, which is essential for ensuring quality development. Additionally, I appreciated the ability to create private repositories to securely store my source code.

One negative aspect I encountered is the lack of user interface customization. While the interface is clear and easy to use, it doesn't offer much flexibility in terms of customization, which can make the user experience a bit dull in the long term.

It is intuitive and easy to use/configure for source control.

Doesn't have much capability outside source control.

Bitbucket is a good version control system, one can easily create branches, delete branches, commit code, merge code and many more. For a beginner it's a good tool to learn about git and to do practice. The advantage of Bitbucket is you can integrate it with project management tools such as JIRA, also you integrate Bitbucket with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins that is the most likeable feature of Bitbucket. Bitbucket is free for single user, so one can do practice easily during learning phase.

Prices are bit high for paid version, Bitbucket provide free version to only <=5 employees, for companies with more than five employees Bitbucket does not provide free service. Also Bitbucket features are outdated as compare to GitHub, GitHub provides lot of extra features as compare to Bitbucket. Sometimes while switching from one section to other Bitbucket was slow.

The product is quite easy to use, tough user and project management on different projects can be a little confusing. Widely used and integrated with a lot of external services. I especially liked the seamless integration with Vercel to publish NexstJs projects without any problem - usually quite hard to configure. Free tier gives you a lot of space and options, nobody else does.

Account management could be improved. The border between free tier and payment version is not always easy to understand.

I have been using Bitbucket (personally and commercially) for couple of years and I'm really satisfied with the services and features that they offer. Letting free users create unlimited repos and allowing up to five users is a good way to go, which attracts more users. Pull requests helps to get code reviewed by experts and get them approve before it available for others and helps to maintain quality code leading to quality software. More useful features like Pipeline lets user to deploy/release more often.

As a market leader, pricing plans can be adjusted to attract more

First of all it is free for small team. For bigger teams it has really reasonable prize. I personally love and prefer Atlassian's products such as Bitbucket, Trello. The Atlassian team behind the product continuously improves their products. Since I started using Bitbucket 5 years ago, they added many features. It has no limitation and pretty good integration with trello, jira and other project management products.

Fortunately, during the last 5 years we didn't face any difficulties using Bitbucket. It works pretty well with my team. But keep-in mind that free version is only for 5 developers for a team.

I liked the option of creating private repositories for free in Bitbucket. Github has also started giving this now but Bitbucket is a pioneer in this. The team collaboration is excellent having complete visibility of individuals. JIRA integration is also very powerful. Developers can easily mark the task completed from one place itself.

Small things like solving merge conflicts from the UI would help senior engineers not to go through the IDE. It also gets slow at a certain point. It takes a lot of time in merging the conflicts.

Easy to integrate with existing projects. Because it is based on the git version control system. So no bitbucket-specific tool is required. This makes it easier to set up a development system.

Sometimes, we experienced issues when creating PR. This is usually due to their server issue. But they inform the status by mail (if we subscribed)

With Bitbucket I can have many private projects and all Git features. I can create project teams by assigning different permissions to each one. The ability to view code in the web interface itself allows for quick checks. You can also check the differences of each commit. Integration with SourceTree is a breeze.

If you use the tool with the default flow, you will have no problems. However, in some situations it is a little difficult to correct. I already had problems that the tool claimed problems in login while all the information was correct.

Intuitively and ease for settings and tweaking. When we have a new team member, 15 seconds are needed to add it and voila he's good to go. The projects itself are enough complicated so we don't need more complications from our tools.

Keep things and menus as simple and clean as possible. Power users will find a ways for their needs even if their menu are a little beep hidden / deeper than expected.

The free plan is great a small development studio or freelancers. It offers unlimited private repos with up to 5 users. The private plans are better than what Github has to offer, at least for small teams. Great Trello and Jira integration. It is still a privately owned company.

Bitbucket has less adaptation than the main competitor Gitbub, due to the open-source community. That sometimes is a downside when collaborating with external entities.

Bitbucket has a good UI and is very good for most of the repository related tasks. It has JIRA integration, so if you put your JIRA ticket numbers in the commit message, Bitbucket will link the pull requests into JIRA. This makes it very easy to access commits and the associated JIRA tickets from bitbucket itself, and vice versa.

It has good branch visualization tools. It lets you select branches from a drop down and compare them with other source barnches. The diff visualizer is pretty good too. It even has good graphical icons to show which branches have been merged/rebased where.

You can use command line git to manage repos as well. With their REST APIs it is possible to create repositories from the command line, which is very useful in cases where you have to do the tedious task of creating hundreds of repositories very similar to one another.

I was unable to find documentation on their APIs to set group and permissions access restrictions from the command line. This was required because we needed to create 100s of repos and allow our users to access them. Because we could not find API documentation easily and were in a time crunch, we had to have developers spend several days manually granting permissions using the web-console. Bitbucket should have these APIs clearly visible and documented.