
Calificación general
Filtrar
Tamaño de la empresa
Tiempo usado
120 opiniones
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Codemagic Experience
Revisado el 24/5/2022
The overall experience is great. Setup the app and deployed in the app store and play store , loved it.
Puntos a favor
1. There is a free plan available and pay as you go plan available
2. I can build ipa and apk in cloud and share it
3. The setup is very easy
4. The UI is super nice and love the experience
5. ci-cd works great
6. add projects from github gitlab etc.
Desventajas
Everythings seems great , just add some tutorial videos or samples in docs.
- Sector: Salud, bienestar y deporte
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Automating deployment of a multi-tenant whitelabel Ionic app
Revisado el 1/7/2021
The time between code in a PR to an actual testing APK or IPA on is very short now. And also doing a production deploy for any of our whitelabel clients is really a breeze.
During the setup phase Codemagic support was also very responsive and helpfull.
Puntos a favor
The product was really easy to set up. Coming from an environment where we had little experience with setting up a CI/CD for a mobile app it was really easy to configure automatic deploys to TestFlight and Play Console.
Desventajas
Coming from Nevercode, the predecessor of Codemagic it was a bit of a shame that we lost the ability to do configurations in a webapp.
Having multiple build configurations from the same repository to different TestFlights and Play Console it would have been easier to be to set all the keystores and certificates in a webapp.
This only seems to be the case for Ionic apps though.
- Sector: Servicios para el consumidor
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
More or less satisfied
Revisado el 6/7/2021
It's been fairly positive. It does feel like there are some missing features, or that some were put together in a way that isn't super useful. I wish there was a way to invalidate the cache with the click of a button like with Nevercode. Also, caching doesn't seem to save much on build time (at least for iOS). Support is usually responsive (though we've had times were we don't get answers for a week).
Puntos a favor
For the most part, it is low/no code. It didn't take too long to get setup. Issues were typical mobile CI tinkering.
Desventajas
It's a bit hard to navigate the UI. Frequently have trouble finding things like where to encrypt data, etc.
- Sector: Desarrollo de programas
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10
The first configuration is really hard for a new user
Revisado el 29/6/2021
First time configuration was really hard. All in all Codemagic is my favorite tool for android deployment.
Puntos a favor
The documentation for new users is a bit insufficient. Mac Pro machines are a bit expensive (for our country).
Desventajas
- Codemagic make easier a deployment after the first configuration. It's really really easy.
- Linux machines are fast and cheap. Android deployment is really cheap and easy.
Alternativas consideradas
CircleCIRazones para cambiar a Codemagic
Codemagic looks more basic and cheaper than others.- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Everyone should use Codemagic
Revisado el 12/7/2021
Puntos a favor
I ran into Codemagic during its early Beta Phase and i haven't stopped using it since. It is easy to use, blazingly fast and saves time.
Building your Flutter app is a complicated and resource intensive task. My MacBook regularly struggled to keep up with the work, it was unusable at times.
Codemagic solves all those problems, and it provided enough free minutes for me for the last year.
It really helps with rapid development as new versions get automatically builded on push and deployed to testflight, all with literally no setup.
Desventajas
Sometimes the build just fails with no real explanation. With standard MacMini VM the task before the real build can take some time. Because of that fixing bugs can be a bit of a pain.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
Thank you!
We understand broken builds can be annoying. We would suggest running your builds locally to see if the same issue occurs.
Generally, errors could be tricky and misleading and do not specifically refer to the root cause of the issue.
If you ever face some errors, please do join our Community Slack (https://slack.codemagic.io/) we are happy to take a look.
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Great tool for our flutter development
Revisado el 1/7/2021
Puntos a favor
Codemagic supports Flutter which is great. It was really easy to get started and we had the pipeline running in second. Not only building but it was able to push apps to app stores which was really handy and helped us quickly deploy our apps. The free tier is generous.
Desventajas
No teams on the free tier but that is understandable.
- Sector: Servicios financieros
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Codemagic is great for Flutter
Revisado el 29/6/2021
Puntos a favor
- easy setup and use
- regular new features (webhooks monitor, .yaml editor, Linux machines, etc.)
- support
Desventajas
- missing the possibility to post release_notes with iOS builds
- missing the possibility to add additional info to the release_notes message (e.g. integration testing results to the Slack message)
- ugly build logs are on a black background (by design)
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Does the job, and does it very well!
Revisado el 13/7/2021
Puntos a favor
What I like most about Codemagic is that they were the first to support Flutter and allowed me to create an easy workflow to release versions of our app. I would also like to point out that Codemagic team is always adding new features. They communicate very well though their slack channel, which I use every time I need some help (an the support team is awesome).
Desventajas
The support is based on European time. Not sure if they expanded this already, but if you want some quick official support and live on PST for example, you may have to wait a bit. But nothing critical.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
Codemagic workspace with +3000k users is the place where you can ask for help if you have problems with using Codemagic.
The workspace is monitored by our Community Manager who ensures that your problems don't go unnoticed.
To receive in-chat priority support we recommend the Business plan. This will secure your open line of communication with a dedicated CI/CD expert based on your time zone.
- Sector: Alimentación y bebidas
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Good value for money, saves tons of time
Revisado el 1/7/2021
It helped us minimize the time needed to distribute builds to our team.
Puntos a favor
It's very simple to set up and it hides the complexity of CI behind a friendly UI. Support team very responsive.
Desventajas
In the beginning, there wasn't too much documentation / implementation was changing fast, but it stabilized over the last months.
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Fantastic platform deploying mobile apps
Revisado el 16/7/2021
Puntos a favor
Codemagic saves me lots of time and removes the need to manually build and deploy apps to the iOS and Android store. The platform has great UI many options to customize your CI/CD Pipeline. The mobile app allows me to download my apps once they have finished building which I love.
Desventajas
There is nothing I dislike about about Codemagic.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
Kuddos for your kind words! A happy customer is what keeps us going! Happy building!
- Sector: Gestión de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Codemagic is awesome
Revisado el 30/6/2021
Awesome experience.
Puntos a favor
Really easy to use and at a really good price.
Desventajas
I have no complaints about Codemagic, I like the way it is.
- Sector: Salud, bienestar y deporte
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
2 years with Codemagic saving the day - every day.
Revisado el 30/6/2021
One-button automated deployments to Apple Test Flight and email distribution to Android have been a godsend! I don't want to do what CM engineers do - which is keep the CI/CD pipeline working. That is a MAJOR, non-differentiated-work headache for any engineering group, especially small startups.
Puntos a favor
Most important: It simply works! I love the integration with Github and the ease of selecting a different branch to build-deploy. My CEO loves getting new builds almost every day to see the latest features. The CI/CD pipeline is so great!
Desventajas
Challenges to setup Google Play Store. Hopefully by following the CM docs I will figure out how to get my app on the Play Store. Also there seems to be too many deployment channels. Maybe this is needed but simpler would be better!
- Sector: Productos cosméticos
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Makes building and deploying your Flutter apps so much easier
Revisado el 4/7/2021
We solve the problem of having to manually configure our apps for productive use, building them and uploading them to the app stores. We drastically reduce the time needed to uploading a new version of our apps, enabling us to publish it more frequent with less hassle and less potential for errors.
Puntos a favor
Once you have setup your publishing pipeline it is really comfortable to use. You do not have to worry about building your apps, configuring it for productive use, and uploading it to the app stores. While most of our requirements can be fulfilled with the workflow editor, all others could be solved using the scripts before or after each step. The documentation is really helpful and shows solution to many problems we were facing when setting up the delivery pipeline.
Desventajas
If you do not use the basic workflow it was quite difficult to setup the publishing pipeline. As soon as one script/part failed, you had to debug it and start the whole build from the start which can take quite a long time. It would be really helpful to have the ability to resume the build.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
Thank you for your feedback.
We cannot do "resume build" due to some reasons. The most basic reason is after they fix the error we cannot guarantee that the fix did not break the previously passed steps. Therefore, it is not feasible to start a build from where they failed.
In this case, we would suggest you to download binary and running them in terminals for that.
Hope this was useful for you.
Happy building!
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Mademedia uses Nevercode!
Revisado el 25/7/2016
At Made Media we rely on Nevercode throughout our development process, all the way from early tests to final releases. It is an incredible and essential tool that every software company needs! Being able to have centralized control over automated builds is amazing. Configuration takes seconds and the resulting built products get packaged, provisioned, and signed and distributed via installable links, all from the same environment, helping us focus on making our product better instead of wasting time on the tedious and repetitive build process.
Puntos a favor
Excellent Github integration; ability to track multiple-projects and branches; automated app provisioning and signing; automated reports on Slack and email; support for automated UI Tests and Amazon Web Services Device Farm.
- Sector: Salud, bienestar y deporte
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Would recommend and actually have multiple times
Revisado el 6/7/2021
Automation, automation, automation.
Puntos a favor
As a developer, I'm very lazy and had build pipelines for web and API configured and happily working but building and releasing the Flutter app was always a pain, thanks to the joys of XCode. Codemagic allowed me to avoid opening XCode at least 90% of the time...
There are loads of clever features but the main thing is having a triggerable and consistent build pipeline for Flutter.
Desventajas
Really didn't have any issues with Codemagic.
Would love it if it could check if the build number clashes with the latest deployed build number to the App Stores to avoid wasting time building, just to have Apple decline the upload, but that's more of a feature request than a con.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
We have calculated that automating your CI/CD pipeline will save you around 20% of dev time!
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10
Easy to set up
Revisado el 1/7/2021
Puntos a favor
The easy of us. Editing via UI or the config file
Desventajas
The time it takes to build, can be quite slow when building
- Sector: Consultoría de gestión
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Very good experience while using CodeMagic CI/CD
Revisado el 4/7/2021
Overall very good experience used CodeMagic CI/CD for almost around 35 apps.
Puntos a favor
Documentation helped for configuring CI/CD pipeline for native as well as hybrid mobile projects.
Desventajas
Need some improvements for Github checks in Github enterprise accounts. Already communicated with your core team. If you can provide it will be very helpful for our team.
- Sector: Telecomunicaciones
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
very easy to use
Revisado el 29/6/2021
Puntos a favor
easy of use.
only need to connect your bitbucket.
Desventajas
maybe we could a have a better build time.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Codemagic review
Revisado el 30/6/2021
for me who use the free version even with the session time limit I can still classify as one of the best production environment tools
Puntos a favor
it is absolutely essential for the cross-platform developer. With.o codemagic it is possible to validate and test the system without the need to create multiple virtual machines and spend time configuring environments.
Desventajas
I still find it a bit expensive, especially considering that many developers are "one-man companies", there should be a fixed weekly price for example. That it would be possible to hire the service for a week without deducting minutes.
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Simple and useful
Revisado el 1/7/2021
Awesome product. If I would need the paid version I would definitly pay for this tool.
Puntos a favor
The simplicity to setup an pipeline. It's super easy to setup everythink the way I need it. Also the signing part for iOS is pretty easy which is complicated with other pipelines
Desventajas
Not much, maybe some syntax highlighting in the shell script parts.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Build iOS Apps without a Mac
Revisado el 9/8/2021
Puntos a favor
I love codemagic because I can deploy iOS applications without an apple device. I can also remote into the virtual mac machine and make changes within xcode. I can leave the app to build and go about my business and be notified via email if it succeeds or fails.
Desventajas
I love that I dont need a macbook to create iOS applications on
- Sector: Servicios financieros
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Codemagic as any other CI alternative
Revisado el 28/7/2022
9/10
Puntos a favor
Codemagic is easy to use. Documentation is well written and easy to understand. Integration with our existing infrastructure was smooth and quick.
Desventajas
Some minor issues, like when I connect new repository into codemagic it was not fetching codemagic.yaml and I needed to refresh and try to add it again.
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Good for handling my react-native deployment
Revisado el 1/7/2021
The setup is not straightforward and I would prefer a more detailed step by step documentation into setting up the deployment process.
However the complexities are linked to App Store/Play Console rather than Codemagic. I had some issues with deployment and I was helped quickly on the codemagic support Slack channel even when I am on the free tier currently.
The debugging capabilities for failed builds are quite nice and clear and it seems highly configurable.
Puntos a favor
I am using this software to deploy react-native app to App store and Play Console. This allows me to save a lot of time, as I can handle the releases automatically for both platforms. The support Slack channel was very good at helping me sort out an issue quickly too.
Desventajas
I would prefer more thorough step by step configuration into react native builds for android/ios.
- Sector: Servicios financieros
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Simplified App Deployment
Revisado el 1/7/2021
Great addition to our business suite. Used weekly wouldnt look for a replacement
Puntos a favor
Ease of integration to appstore connect (ios). Good documentation - great simple to understand user interface
Desventajas
Setup of the yaml file slightly confusing with multiple versions on the net
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Excellent tool to build on iOS
Revisado el 22/7/2021
Deploying and releasing iOS apps on both
Puntos a favor
I'm able to deploy my Flutter project on iOS too thanks to this piece of software. It also lets me see the logs in real time and set a timeout for too long builds.
Desventajas
It's pretty slow (simple Flutter iOS app = ~40 minutes) but it's fully understandable since I'm using the free tier.
Respuesta de Nevercode Traducir a Español
Thank you for your response! We offer Mac Pro instances for iOS builds which are much up to 40% faster. You can read more about the machine specifics here: https://docs.codemagic.io/specs/versions4/
And as a recent update, we provide Linux instances for faster Android builds. Please learn more here:https://docs.codemagic.io/specs/versions-linux/