Opiniones de Essential Studio

Es un producto fácil de utilizar, y se adapta rápido a los proyectos que estamos desarrollando

el tiempo de respuesta de los Bug, que se basen a los votos para atenderlos.

Syncfusion controls whether for the Web or any other platform are well built, well documented, and well supported. All three of these points are extremely vital to project success.

The thing is, if I ever have an issue, I get ahold of online support and they help us out right away. They always help me find the correct way to use a control, and give me a sample to help the process along. In some cases, they will even update their own code to support a feature I think is important.

the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

take time to learn to use it's not straightforward. first two months you need contact to support a lot.but the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

Its price policy for small company, it's versatility (Xamarin, ASP.NET, and more)

Nothing, i think i don't get any problem using Essential Studio

It has many components, specially if you are developing a complex SaaS Enterprise platform.

Lack of documentation is nerve wrecking. Hence you can get stuck on very stupid issues. Somehow, the gantt chart was not working due to how i ordered the props on my vuejs app.

The producto is amazing and is very easy to. Integrate in the diferente kind of projects and technologies. I used the tech customer service and they answered all my questions. To finish.. You have a community license and that's wonderful for independent developers like me. I hope to grow my small Business and pay for a great producto that is Worth every dolar invested in it

Nothing to say. The product is amazing and very easy to use and integrate

The wide range of components that can be used to create web appsSwesome and very responsive support team

I couldn't find anything inherantly wrong with the suite. Any difficulties I faced were addressed by the support team and online demos

Reading documentation and using demo content ie easy and saves a lot of time developing

The online demos defaulting to blazor server and killing your laptop battery while its open on in the background

Ease of use, readily available documentation and support Response. Specifically functionality offered in Doc processing library and File Viewers.

Its difficult to call out any real cons.

Greatly simplifies and speeds up my app development

Overall it's well documented, but it can be hard to find the relevant documentation

It has a community edition, which was important for, as I'm starting up a small company, and donøt have the financials for purchasing the commercial edition yet.

I don't have enough experience co comment on this yet.

Includes a lot of features, and add new features. Has some free books.

The documentation is very bad. Include only very basic and unreal samples
The support is very bad I spent one year with some errors with the report component. They fix one bug with the report and added 5 or 6 errors. I moved to Devexpress and after some years they still continue working with the bugs.
I tested xamarin and the demo includes a lot of errors.
I tested angular and got a lot error several weeks and support doesn't help me.

I like having the large number of components in the bundle as it reduces the number of third party components I need to complete my projects. I also like how rapidly SyncFusion rolls out updates to their products and the quality and speed of response of their technical support.

I am not sure if this is SyncFusion Blazor specific or something inherent with Blazor itself, but the lack of Support for GUID in their dropdown list and other things like their event callbacks require that I change my GUIDs to string types in my models and then have to map them back to GUIDs for CRUD to the backend. Also, I really wish they had a good Step / Wizard component. I currently have to use Radzen's Step component for my WIzards and there are often CSS conflicts between Radzen and SyncFusion. If they do not add one, I will most likely have to create my own custom Step (Wizard) component before the project is finished.

Lots of components for different platforms. It is easy to use. Tech support is world class, I usually have an answer in 24 hours, and they let you know when it is going to take longer time and provide an expected date. There is a Community version which is free but you must qualify to get it (this is the one I use). Although I have not used them, there are also Reporting, Data Science and Business Intelligence support, which I plan to test shortly.

Documentation can be improved with more examples. However, this is not critical.

We have been using Syncfusion for a long long time (about 8+ years).

We were looking for a component suite which had all the necessary parts required for our software. At the time (and this still ultimately holds) Syncfusion were only the only ones to have a web Diagramming component AND all the other components (editable grids, hierarchical grids). An added bonus were the file handling packs (Excel, etc) so we can offer with our solution integration with Excel.

We've just recently upgraded the diagramming component to the new JS version and the feedback from our customers has been nothing but positive.

There are a couple of things:

- Documentation - The online documentation has bugs in that demos don't load and sample code cannot be seen.

- Quality - Sometime the QA of the components could be a bit better.

Great Controls, great Service, Timely iterations

Behind in Maui and Blazor controls. There is nothing else

I like the most Blazor diagram which works very smooth inside browser. But there are many good controls like dialog, excel and PDF creation API. The most important thing is an outstanding support from Syncfusion which exceeds expectations. You can get direct support on chat in few minutes. If you start with specific technology this level of support is a big advantage.

I use Blazor grid with many columns (about 100), which are dynamically created (DynamicDictionary) and rendering such grid is slow. Editing complex controls in this grid is also slow.

It is easy to implement and good support

Not easy to what you are looking for in documentation

The span of features is impressive, and when operated out-of-the-box everything "works". Once past the licensing issues, it is easy to use within an application for normal, simple features and feature set combinations.

The documentation detailed how to implement several features for the Grid control. However, using the features resulted in unstable and inconsistent behavior in the UI. Working directly with support/development programmers from Syncfusion, found that there were several issues with timing within the control code and how to access the control API that were not documented. The result from the developer sessions was more complicated and very dissimilar to the published documentation for these features, but it finally started to work consistently.