Essential Studio

Paquete de desarrollo de interfaz de usuario para .NET, Xamarin, JavaScript y Angular

Calificación general

4,4 /5
(445)
Relación calidad-precio
4,5/5
Funcionalidades
4,5/5
Facilidad de uso
4,2/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,7/5

90%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

445 opiniones

Jose
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio

Revisado el 21/12/2020

tiempos de desarrollo muy buenos

tiempos de desarrollo muy buenos

Puntos a favor

Es un producto fácil de utilizar, y se adapta rápido a los proyectos que estamos desarrollando

Desventajas

el tiempo de respuesta de los Bug, que se basen a los votos para atenderlos.

Greg
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion is my one stop shop for User Controls

Revisado el 18/11/2021

I have used Syncfusion controls for years with great success. I have built many project using both...

I have used Syncfusion controls for years with great success. I have built many project using both the Web Controls, as well as Blazor controls.

Puntos a favor

Syncfusion controls whether for the Web or any other platform are well built, well documented, and well supported. All three of these points are extremely vital to project success.

Desventajas

The thing is, if I ever have an issue, I get ahold of online support and they help us out right away. They always help me find the correct way to use a control, and give me a sample to help the process along. In some cases, they will even update their own code to support a feature I think is important.

Ali
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio

Revisado el 18/5/2020

Puntos a favor

the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

Desventajas

take time to learn to use it's not straightforward. first two months you need contact to support a lot.but the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

Elia
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential studio, a good opportunity for small companies

Revisado el 28/8/2023

Puntos a favor

Its price policy for small company, it's versatility (Xamarin, ASP.NET, and more)

Desventajas

Nothing, i think i don't get any problem using Essential Studio

Saruulerdene
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10

Box full of buggy components, but still helps out.

Revisado el 16/8/2023

Its okey. But I would look at alternatives, and give a heavy amount of attention to their documentat...

Its okey. But I would look at alternatives, and give a heavy amount of attention to their documentation before choosing a similar service.

Puntos a favor

It has many components, specially if you are developing a complex SaaS Enterprise platform.

Desventajas

Lack of documentation is nerve wrecking. Hence you can get stuck on very stupid issues. Somehow, the gantt chart was not working due to how i ordered the props on my vuejs app.

Juan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion for independent developers

Revisado el 28/6/2023

I used your product in wpf, windows forms, blazor., and very soon in a small maui projects.

I used your product in wpf, windows forms, blazor., and very soon in a small maui projects.

Puntos a favor

The producto is amazing and is very easy to. Integrate in the diferente kind of projects and technologies. I used the tech customer service and they answered all my questions. To finish.. You have a community license and that's wonderful for independent developers like me. I hope to grow my small Business and pay for a great producto that is Worth every dolar invested in it

Desventajas

Nothing to say. The product is amazing and very easy to use and integrate

Jonathan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Organización cívica y social
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

A fantastic framework with exemplary support

Revisado el 14/9/2023

This has suite saved me a considerable amount of time developing a web app I'm using as the...

This has suite saved me a considerable amount of time developing a web app I'm using as the backbone of my business

Puntos a favor

The wide range of components that can be used to create web appsSwesome and very responsive support team

Desventajas

I couldn't find anything inherantly wrong with the suite. Any difficulties I faced were addressed by the support team and online demos

Naail
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Easy to develop with

Revisado el 2/8/2023

Puntos a favor

Reading documentation and using demo content ie easy and saves a lot of time developing

Desventajas

The online demos defaulting to blazor server and killing your laptop battery while its open on in the background

steve
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Great experience with Synscfusion

Revisado el 21/8/2023

Puntos a favor

Ease of use, readily available documentation and support Response. Specifically functionality offered in Doc processing library and File Viewers.

Desventajas

Its difficult to call out any real cons.

Sophie
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

great addition

Revisado el 23/8/2023

Puntos a favor

Greatly simplifies and speeds up my app development

Desventajas

Overall it's well documented, but it can be hard to find the relevant documentation

Kenneth
Calificación general
  • Sector: Productos químicos
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

My review

Revisado el 4/8/2023

Puntos a favor

It has a community edition, which was important for, as I'm starting up a small company, and donøt have the financials for purchasing the commercial edition yet.

Desventajas

I don't have enough experience co comment on this yet.

Abigail
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 0.0 /10

Product with a lot of bugs and bad support

Revisado el 16/1/2021

Puntos a favor

Includes a lot of features, and add new features. Has some free books.

Desventajas

The documentation is very bad. Include only very basic and unreal samples
The support is very bad I spent one year with some errors with the report component. They fix one bug with the report and added 5 or 6 errors. I moved to Devexpress and after some years they still continue working with the bugs.
I tested xamarin and the demo includes a lot of errors.
I tested angular and got a lot error several weeks and support doesn't help me.

Craig
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

One of the first companies to give entrepreneurial Software Developers a break.

Revisado el 11/8/2020

A great thing about the Syncfusion components is that they work in Xamarin. I can create mobile...

A great thing about the Syncfusion components is that they work in Xamarin. I can create mobile apps without changes. Xamarin did not generate a Windows app that I liked, so I build an app using Winforms that looks like the mobile apps. Syncfusion for Winforms allowed me to do this and share code with the mobile apps.

Puntos a favor

Six years ago, I started developing a large scale enterprise product. It required a lot of full stack development. It runs on Windows, Android and IOS. The infrastructures is all Docker containers. I am not a UI guy and didn’t have the time to build the UI components needed. Syncfusion components work well. Their generous licensing policies made using the tools possible.

Most impressive, is that I have received the same quality support as one of their paying customers. My system has architecture that I developed to solve a problem specific to my target industry. I did hit a bug that had not been seen before. Syncfusion’s support staff verified that the bug was in their code and issued a patch without argument. I can’t tell you how many times a company has told me “the software is not supposed to do that, so it’s not a bug”.

Desventajas

There are components that I found difficult to understand even after reading the doc. But it was more the task at hand then a problem with a component. For example: To use the Word functions to manipulate a Word file, you must understand how Word structures its documents. But a note to support always results in a sample. So, really there is nothing negative to say.

Vincent
Calificación general
  • Sector: Administración educativa
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

Expensive and poor support but best available solution

Revisado el 23/7/2020

I had to rely on their support team for almost everything when it came to integrating the scheduling...

I had to rely on their support team for almost everything when it came to integrating the scheduling component into my software because the documentation was really poor. There is a lot of documentation but the problem with it is that it just doesn't explain how to use anything. You'd find a reference to the problem you're having, and the documentation tells you what this thing is supposed to do but doesn't tell you how to implement it. At times it just seemed like it was written from the perspective of somebody who already knew how to use everything and that's obviously not very useful.

The good thing is the support team is always willing to help (though I always had to wait until the next day for an answer) but the bad thing is that sometimes they didn't read my question carefully and ended up giving answers to questions I wasn't even asking. It was at times frustrating to deal with support (and I think the language barrier might've been the issue), but credit to them they were always polite and willing to help. I just wish I didn't need to call on them for everything.

They also have a support chat and a few times I had a good guy who was able to be helpful, but other times the person answering the chat was almost useless, redirecting me to tier 2 support for even simple things. One guy even told me "Chat support is only a triage. We don't actually help you."

Puntos a favor

I got Syncfusion primarily for the scheduler component and having looked at other options, this was the best front end solution I could find for my software. It's not perfect, but it's very good in terms of functionality and user interface. I think my clients will enjoy using this scheduler.

Desventajas

It's a bit awkward to implement and the documentation is very poor. As for the scheduler, it comes with built in popup windows for creating and modifying events, but trying to get their styling to match my own was a nightmare because they did not use the same classes for every window, and not even the same classes for every button. It was surprising how inconsistent they were with their styling and that made it impossible to create consistent spacing and styling to match the rest of my system, so I ended up blocking all the popups and creating my own but this also was not easy or obvious. I had to contact support several times just to figure out how to use my own popups.

David
Calificación general
  • Sector: Automatización industrial
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

SyncFusion Blazor Components Review

Revisado el 30/7/2020

I really like the product suite. I find that I can do almost everything I need to do using their...

I really like the product suite. I find that I can do almost everything I need to do using their out-of-box experience.

Puntos a favor

I like having the large number of components in the bundle as it reduces the number of third party components I need to complete my projects. I also like how rapidly SyncFusion rolls out updates to their products and the quality and speed of response of their technical support.

Desventajas

I am not sure if this is SyncFusion Blazor specific or something inherent with Blazor itself, but the lack of Support for GUID in their dropdown list and other things like their event callbacks require that I change my GUIDs to string types in my models and then have to map them back to GUIDs for CRUD to the backend. Also, I really wish they had a good Step / Wizard component. I currently have to use Radzen's Step component for my WIzards and there are often CSS conflicts between Radzen and SyncFusion. If they do not add one, I will most likely have to create my own custom Step (Wizard) component before the project is finished.

Glenniel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

A Must Have for Every Software Developer

Revisado el 21/3/2021

Overall, I am very satisfied with the product and I strongly suggest that you start using it too....

Overall, I am very satisfied with the product and I strongly suggest that you start using it too. Before, designing the user interface consumes a lot of time. Since I started using Syncfusion, most of my time now are dedicated to coding the business logic. These translates to faster development time and spending more time with my family.

Puntos a favor

Whether you are building a website, desktop or phone applications, the tool you will probably need is already available within the library. The dashboard application also eases the development time by providing real life sample codes.

They have regular updates with new features and bug fixes. If you encounter a bug, just report it to them and expect a fix on their next update.

Desventajas

Although the software provides lots of tools and libraries, there are still some room for improvement. They counter this by having an amazing group of customer support people that are always ready to fix or offer other solutions. They will even provide you with a working code solution.

Jorge
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion Essential Studio - A world class set of tools

Revisado el 18/2/2021

Until now, I see that Syncfusion controls are enough for all my development needs.

Until now, I see that Syncfusion controls are enough for all my development needs.

Puntos a favor

Lots of components for different platforms. It is easy to use. Tech support is world class, I usually have an answer in 24 hours, and they let you know when it is going to take longer time and provide an expected date. There is a Community version which is free but you must qualify to get it (this is the one I use). Although I have not used them, there are also Reporting, Data Science and Business Intelligence support, which I plan to test shortly.

Desventajas

Documentation can be improved with more examples. However, this is not critical.

James
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion is key to our success....really!

Revisado el 7/8/2020

Puntos a favor

We have been using Syncfusion for a long long time (about 8+ years).

We were looking for a component suite which had all the necessary parts required for our software. At the time (and this still ultimately holds) Syncfusion were only the only ones to have a web Diagramming component AND all the other components (editable grids, hierarchical grids). An added bonus were the file handling packs (Excel, etc) so we can offer with our solution integration with Excel.

We've just recently upgraded the diagramming component to the new JS version and the feedback from our customers has been nothing but positive.

Desventajas

There are a couple of things:

- Documentation - The online documentation has bugs in that demos don't load and sample code cannot be seen.

- Quality - Sometime the QA of the components could be a bit better.

Randy
Calificación general
  • Sector: Deportes
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Synfusion Review Randy

Revisado el 12/4/2023

Really like them

Really like them

Puntos a favor

Great Controls, great Service, Timely iterations

Desventajas

Behind in Maui and Blazor controls. There is nothing else

Angelo
Calificación general
  • Sector: Estudios de mercado
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10

Very good, but get in their own way of being excellent

Revisado el 9/3/2023

Easy-to-implement software generates ad-hoc reports in PPTX, PDF, and DOCX format, with fully-editab...

Easy-to-implement software generates ad-hoc reports in PPTX, PDF, and DOCX format, with fully-editable charts. However, I've been told more than once that such-and-such is not possible, and that's a turn-off.

Puntos a favor

Easy to implement. Takes care of 90% of client needs.

Desventajas

Inflexibility of upgrades. Being told something "can't be done" despite other software suites being able to do them.

Waldemar
Calificación general
  • Sector: Propiedad inmobiliaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Syncfusion Essential Studio Blazor - large set of controls, excellent support

Revisado el 6/4/2023

Puntos a favor

I like the most Blazor diagram which works very smooth inside browser. But there are many good controls like dialog, excel and PDF creation API. The most important thing is an outstanding support from Syncfusion which exceeds expectations. You can get direct support on chat in few minutes. If you start with specific technology this level of support is a big advantage.

Desventajas

I use Blazor grid with many columns (about 100), which are dynamically created (DynamicDictionary) and rendering such grid is slow. Editing complex controls in this grid is also slow.

Funso
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Lots of featureses

Revisado el 29/4/2021

Very good experience

Very good experience

Puntos a favor

It is easy to implement and good support

Desventajas

Not easy to what you are looking for in documentation

Alternativas consideradas

App Builder

Razones para elegir Essential Studio

Business decision

Razones para cambiar a Essential Studio

Ease of use and community version
Grant
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion in WPF C# applications

Revisado el 14/4/2020

There is learning curve of course, but there are lots of examples included.
I learned a lot more...

There is learning curve of course, but there are lots of examples included.
I learned a lot more working thru the examples than from reading the documentation, which is typical I guess.
It did most of what I hoped and am satisfied.

Puntos a favor

Graphical display of data in animated pie charts etc., and easier customization of data grid control columns.

Desventajas

It is impossible to make this library complete... in that every control anyone could ever want could never be included.

But I needed control which was not included in the library quite quickly.
A data grid/tree control is include, which works well, but a combo box/tree control was also needed. An example of one of these is in
https://www.brad-smith.info/blog/archives/193
I ended up writing my own using examples from the web.

I also had problems with the color picker... a change in the selected color wasn't easily communicated to the other program levels, and the whole control was complicated and heavy weight.

Emmanuel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Great set of components

Revisado el 20/4/2020

I have been very satisfied with Essential Studio. It took a little time to learn (coming from...

I have been very satisfied with Essential Studio. It took a little time to learn (coming from having used DevExpress), but after a while, it was easy to use and understand. The documentation (demos and docs) are very good and comprehensive. The support (ticketing service) is excellent!!

Puntos a favor

The suite contains enough components for all platforms that are relevant to us, namely: ASP.NET Core, Blazor, Xamarin Forms, UWP, WPF.
The components are beautiful. I love the Xamarin Forms support and components.

Desventajas

Integrating all web components (ASP.NET Core, Blazor) don't always follow usage patterns relative to the platform. Most of the time, may components rely on javascript or HTML content, which is not natural patter for the platform. For example, with Blazor, a lot of things are done with HTML, instead of integrating it directly into the Razor Component.

william
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

Good product, needs better documentation

Revisado el 19/7/2021

Work directly with the supplied controls and not using the UI for Essential Studio.

Work directly with the supplied controls and not using the UI for Essential Studio.

Puntos a favor

The span of features is impressive, and when operated out-of-the-box everything "works". Once past the licensing issues, it is easy to use within an application for normal, simple features and feature set combinations.

Desventajas

The documentation detailed how to implement several features for the Grid control. However, using the features resulted in unstable and inconsistent behavior in the UI. Working directly with support/development programmers from Syncfusion, found that there were several issues with timing within the control code and how to access the control API that were not documented. The result from the developer sessions was more complicated and very dissimilar to the published documentation for these features, but it finally started to work consistently.