Opiniones de Essential Studio

Essential Studio

4,5 (656)
¡Escribe una opinión!
Paquete de desarrollo de interfaz de usuario para .NET, Xamarin, JavaScript y Angular

Calificación general

4,5 /5
(656)
Relación calidad-precio
4,5/5
Funcionalidades
4,5/5
Facilidad de uso
4,2/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,7/5

92%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

656 opiniones

Miquel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Muy contento

Revisado el 20/11/2024

Puntos a favor

Suite muy completa y en general bien documentada. Atención rápida y profesional en los casos abiertos y en la resolución de dudas. Se actualiza con frecuencia.

Desventajas

En algunos controles falta documentación.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Desarrollo de programas
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Mi experiencia

Revisado el 19/7/2024

Excelente producto.
Resuelve muchas de las necesidades que se requieren en el desarrollo de una...

Excelente producto.
Resuelve muchas de las necesidades que se requieren en el desarrollo de una app.

Puntos a favor

Sus diversas librerías con amplias funcionalidades.

Desventajas

Cierta complejidad en la utilización de algunas de las librerías.

Oscar
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 3.0 /10

Funcional

Revisado el 14/6/2024

Puntos a favor

La curva de aprendizaje para el uso de sus componentes o controles está en la media, una vez que adoptas Syncfusion en tus proyectos es muy funcional, rápido y mejora enormemente la calidad visual de la interfaz de usuario.

Desventajas

Algunos componentes les hace falta madurar sin embargo están en constantes actuaciones y correcciones.

Jose
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio

Revisado el 21/12/2020

tiempos de desarrollo muy buenos

tiempos de desarrollo muy buenos

Puntos a favor

Es un producto fácil de utilizar, y se adapta rápido a los proyectos que estamos desarrollando

Desventajas

el tiempo de respuesta de los Bug, que se basen a los votos para atenderlos.

Henryk
Henryk
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Great product with great support

Revisado el 12/6/2024

Essential Studio offers a lot and is great value for developers who need to span several platforms,...

Essential Studio offers a lot and is great value for developers who need to span several platforms, but the stand-out feature of the product and Syncfusion in general has been the technical support team. Even if the product can't do something out of the box, the team will nearly always help you find a way to achieve it. Regular release schedule ensures that any issues you come across do get addressed fairly quickly (depending on complexity/severity) and the product development team is also responsive to feature enhancements.
There maybe others who offer similar tool set, but where Essential Studio and Syncfusion have shined for us, is the support and continuous improvement.

Puntos a favor

Polished and highly customizable controls spanning several platforms, ease of use, great documentation, continued improvement and great customer support.

Desventajas

Apart from the recent licensing changes, can't think of any, and even then the sales team worked hard with us to make the transition less challenging.

Alternativas consideradas

Kendo UI y Highcharts

Razones para cambiar a Essential Studio

Essential Studio covered both those products and some.
BAPPADITYA
Calificación general
  • Sector: Ropa y moda
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

my feedback

Revisado el 6/12/2024

Flexible and right upgrade in in time , as MS .NET version get upgrade.

Flexible and right upgrade in in time , as MS .NET version get upgrade.

Puntos a favor

This is one of .NET tool I ma using more that 10 year. With .NET platform upgrade , this tool have upgraded have us back to back perfect support and makes development team deliveries easy.

Desventajas

It's XL , PFD manage module is very good; give us huge help in our projects

Dimitris
Calificación general
  • Sector: Seguros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 1.0 /10

Bad Documentation - Not a Vue Framework

Revisado el 6/11/2024

At start it seemed quite good, because it packs a lot of features at a single ecosystem. Also it...

At start it seemed quite good, because it packs a lot of features at a single ecosystem. Also it seemed like it supported the material design and especially the Material Design 3, that Quasar uses (my projects Vue framework).

I started because I wanted a TreeGrid component to be used along the Quasar framework. I followed the examples but I ended up with a different result. The result from the site looked like Quasar but my result looked like there is no css (plain html)!

I opened a bug report and the result was a fix in the screenshot of the documentation! The screenshot used to look like material design, close to what quasar looks, and now it looks like there is no particular design, just plain html!

What is the point of creating a guide/tutorial for quasar when the result looks nothing like quasar?

Also the components feel like they are not Vue components. They seem like something completely different that somebody, without good Vue knowledge, tried to adapt for Vue.

In general the experience was quite bad!

Puntos a favor

Lots of components with a lot of functionality build in.

Desventajas

At least for Vue, it is not Vue and the documentation is quite bad!

For the documentation I couldn't find how to modify the examples to create the result I wanted. I went to the documentation and i could see it used some options but no reference for them or what it was. For some reason it seemed like I had to know everything else beforehand. I ended up googling the terms and following google results to find how to perform some simple changes.

Then the components themself! Syncfusion is a Javascript framework that they tried to adapt it for Vue, but it doesn't follow the Vue principles and methodology. We have to adapt to syncfusion and forget about Vue!
At least for my experience and what I found for the limited time I worked with it.

Oliver
Calificación general
  • Sector: Deportes
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

An excellent controls package for Xamarin/MAUI with fantastic support

Revisado el 10/10/2024

I've used Syncfusion's MAUI controls for three years now, and it's been great (see Pros above). The...

I've used Syncfusion's MAUI controls for three years now, and it's been great (see Pros above). The support has been a particular benefit as you don't feel left in the lurch trying to code work-arounds when you've got help on hand. I can't recommend SyncFusion enough - I haven't found anything with similar functionality and support levels, particularly for small/start-up businesses and developers.

Puntos a favor

I've been using the Syncfusion MAUI controls for an app I've been building for three years. In addition to the great functionality (which you can read about on the website), the support has been amazing - they get back, often within 24h, with either an answer, or a bug fix that is usually released within a week or two (patch provided in the meantime). In particular from my perspective, they offer a free Community Version for businesses under $1m in revenue, seemingly with the same/similar support levels as paid versions.

Desventajas

Not a lot. There are quite a few code changes between the Xaml and MAUI versions, but mostly these are for a good reason, well documented and just requires care and attention in making the relevant updates.

Stan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Petróleo y energía
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Raving Fan

Revisado el 18/12/2024

Excellent and comprehensive set of components.

Excellent and comprehensive set of components.

Puntos a favor

The product is great but it is the support that differentiates them from the competition. Excellent support and very thorough examples to help you achieve the desired result.

Desventajas

The documentation could be a little better but definitely not a deal breaker.

Michele
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Awesome components, improvable documentation

Revisado el 9/1/2025

Puntos a favor

There are a lot of fully customizable components that cover almost everything you could need.

Desventajas

Sometimes the documentation is not clear or not updated. Some more examples would be really nice.

Søren
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Excellent functionality and world class support

Revisado el 31/12/2024

Very satisfied with the broad functionality. Can strongly recommend it.

Very satisfied with the broad functionality. Can strongly recommend it.

Puntos a favor

Comprehensive functionality - generally good quality however world class support. Bugs are corrected very fast.

Desventajas

At time bug level is on the high side, however it is not always easy to determine whether issue is a Syncfusion or a .NET MAUI issue

Smitesh
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Syncfusion Essential Studio

Revisado el 18/12/2024

Excellent tool library for out of the box ready to plugin controls

Excellent tool library for out of the box ready to plugin controls

Puntos a favor

Great set of controls that work seamlessly with .Net Blazor Server App

Desventajas

the installation was quite large and bulky to setup.

Enrique
Calificación general
  • Sector: Hospital y atención sanitaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 3.0 /10

Boost your development with syncfusion

Revisado el 4/12/2024

Very good experience and it boost my development

Very good experience and it boost my development

Puntos a favor

The appearance and the overall behavior .

Desventajas

Sometimes they not behave as expected or as exposed in the documentation

Nguyen
Calificación general
  • Sector: Contabilidad
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Good. Recommend

Revisado el 13/12/2024

Puntos a favor

Free but good support. Support many platforms.
Lots of good features and easy to use.
Always listen to user feedback and update very quickly (appreciate it)

Desventajas

Almost none.

Dave
Calificación general
  • Sector: Minería y metalurgia
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 5.001-10.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Professional UI components with solid performance for the past 20 years or so.

Revisado el 19/9/2024

The Syncfusion UI components for Windows programming (WinForms, WPF, UWP, etc) definitely add a...

The Syncfusion UI components for Windows programming (WinForms, WPF, UWP, etc) definitely add a more polished look for the software I write. I use only a small fraction of the available components, primarily charting, data grids and docking manager, occasionally some others like the diagram and editor components. As one who writes software primarily for industrial applications (machine controls, HMI etc) that are meant to be installed and run 24x7 for months at a time in very harsh conditions, their components run solidly and without long term issues like memory leaks that can be difficult to pinpoint. The only "crash" I've seen in their components was from the Chart control displaying a large red X - and even in those few instances, the program kept running without the chart function. A later release seems to have resolved whatever the issue was.

Support for the components is through form submission on their website. I was skeptical at first, but it has proven very effective over the years and their response time is very good - even had one instance where I was coding at 2am and submitted and was able to chat with their support person in Inda for a very quick resolution. Other issues that take a day or two, generally code samples of the problem are given as part of their solution which is very helpful.

Puntos a favor

As a long-time user of Syncfusion (since .NET 1.1 about 20 years ago), the consistency and availability of the platform has been key in delivering equipment in the mining industry. I've seen many tech stacks come and go in that time, and I've been able to operate essentially the same code-base the entire time, upgrading the .NET versions and the Syncfusion libraries with virtually no breaking changes. I've used Syncfusion in various side projects with WPF, UWP, etc and others in our company have used the React.js components, the commonality between the platforms helps reduce the learning curve when changing platforms.

Desventajas

The licensing structure. I started as a single developer in a very small company with the product and it was very cost effective. When we sold to a larger company, I continued with the single seat until we added other devs and eventually had a global license (which is definitely cost effective for a team). Since we had a corporate restructuring, that global license is now back to basically a single dev license which we pay the same price as the previous global license. Their latest license structure is cost-prohibitive for a single developer seat. There are a few components I find

Esman
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Essential Studio Review - Esman

Revisado el 14/10/2024

Overall, Essential Studio is a fantastic tool, and I would highly recommend it to anyone.

Overall, Essential Studio is a fantastic tool, and I would highly recommend it to anyone.

Puntos a favor

I really enjoy using Essential Studio because it allows me to focus more on backend development while providing ready-to-use frontend components. The learning curve for using the components is minimal, and the comprehensive documentation makes it easy to get started. Additionally, the components are regularly updated to stay in line with evolving .NET versions, which I find highly beneficial. I also appreciate the license granted, which further enhances the experience.

Desventajas

So far, the Syncfusion collapsible sidebar doesn't seem to work in Blazor WebAssembly Core.In fact l have never managed to make even the basic sidebar to work. Despite trying multiple times, the provided samples did not work in my scenario. I would really like to use the sidebar in my projects if the issue I'm facing can be resolved.

Gregory
Calificación general
  • Sector: Administración gubernamental
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio, Community License

Revisado el 6/8/2024

I have been using Essential Studio, with a community license, for over a year now, and I have been...

I have been using Essential Studio, with a community license, for over a year now, and I have been extremely satisfied with the components, frequency of updates, and overall experience.

Puntos a favor

The package includes all the components that we would use for all of our products.

Desventajas

I do not like the installed product explorer; my preference is to use the website.

Mario
Calificación general
  • Sector: Maquinaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 0.0 /10

Not satisfied

Revisado el 25/10/2024

Puntos a favor

Essential Studio is very comprehensive and contains components for almost every application

Desventajas

The components are not really standardized. For example, one component has a style property, the other does not. Some have the CssClass property, some do not. In general it is not great experience to work with Syncfusion Blazor components.

Basil
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Crucial tool for our business

Revisado el 26/9/2024

Very happy, especially with their support.

Very happy, especially with their support.

Puntos a favor

It includes everything we need to build our apps. Could not have developed our product as quickly as we had, without Syncfusion.

Desventajas

Can sometimes be buggy, and the documentation aren’t always up to date.

Nick
Calificación general
  • Sector: Contabilidad
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio review

Revisado el 8/5/2024

Very satisfied with the rich features and components available from the most popular platforms for...

Very satisfied with the rich features and components available from the most popular platforms for software development. Also very satisfied with the availabilty and quality of support from the team.

Puntos a favor

A lot of features . Extended documentation and source code samples. Excellent and efficient support from the team.

Desventajas

More samples on Blazor as this is the platform I use most.

Mitchel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Great .NET Tooling Option for Teams

Revisado el 5/11/2024

Fantastic, great product happy to use it and highly recommend.

Fantastic, great product happy to use it and highly recommend.

Puntos a favor

The product contains a number of incredibly helpful tools that allow us to be productive and deliver high quality solutions to our customers. The customer service is fantastic as well when needed.

Desventajas

Documentation is good, but often times we find it a bit harder to "find" the content that we need so we end up contacting support. However, many are on-time learning items.

Daniel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

A mature and full featuered product

Revisado el 24/9/2024

I started to used it as a paid version 10 years ago, but since I am working alone and creating...

I started to used it as a paid version 10 years ago, but since I am working alone and creating small products I am using the free version, and I am really happy with it. I have sometimes been hassitant to use the free version as you don't really know how long it will be free, but everytime the conclution is that; if I need to pay for it, it is worth it.
I have used other components too, like DevX, and some other products might be more stable and have other components, but Syncfusion for me has ticked the most boxes every time.

Puntos a favor

The product has a lot of features, and expands all the time. The team seams to listen to the feedback and adds requested features. As an example, I used a side bar component that had hide and show mode, but I wanted to have hide, show and maximize, a three steps. 6 month later, in an update, this feature was added.

The support is quick and often give you a code example that you can copy from.

Desventajas

Some features are not, "native" standard, or using the standard of the techology, but using thier own standard. It is handy if you change techology, but could be hard to get in to if you going from a standard component to a Sycfusion.

Also, as there are a lot of new features added, the documentation is not always there, so you often need to lean on the support to give you an example how to use a feature rather than using the documentation; so the published issues and examples are often more useful than the documenation except to get the basis.

Piercarlo
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Awesome Essential Studio

Revisado el 22/10/2024

One of the best choices I made was to use syncfusion's Essential Studio. My experience has been...

One of the best choices I made was to use syncfusion's Essential Studio. My experience has been smooth and completely satisfactory. Through Essential Studio I have significantly accelerated my application development process.

Puntos a favor

the most comprehensive framework on the market, which comes with superlative support.
you can develop any kind of application focusing only on business logic using ready-made and highly customizable components.

Desventajas

The awesome support, essential for not stopping your work. Sometimes in the framework you may find some bugs, which promptly the support solves within a short time. Also if you have any problem on using the framework with a ticket request you solve

Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Amazing WPF and Xamarin components

Revisado el 18/11/2024

I like Syncfusion WPF and Xamarin components. I recommend them to anyone who needs them to make...

I like Syncfusion WPF and Xamarin components. I recommend them to anyone who needs them to make their application look good.

Puntos a favor

I am using the Syncfusion WPF and Xamarin components.
Those components make my application look great.
Xamarin has well-written documentation and also their support is very helpful.

Desventajas

I don't have anything negative about the Essential Studio so far.

Calificación general
  • Sector: Desarrollo de programas
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

The Only Software Library You'll Ever Need

Revisado el 9/11/2024

I've used Syncfusion for a while, and I'm really happy with it. Development time is reduced by the...

I've used Syncfusion for a while, and I'm really happy with it. Development time is reduced by the documentation's satisfactory helpfulness and ease of use.

Puntos a favor

It offers flexible solutions for majority of programming issues.

Desventajas

After upgrades, there are a few minor bugs.