Essential Studio

Paquete de desarrollo de interfaz de usuario para .NET, Xamarin, JavaScript y Angular

Calificación general

4,4 /5
(355)
Relación calidad-precio
4,5/5
Funcionalidades
4,5/5
Facilidad de uso
4,2/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,7/5

90%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

355 opiniones

Jose
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio

Revisado el 21/12/2020

tiempos de desarrollo muy buenos

Puntos a favor

Es un producto fácil de utilizar, y se adapta rápido a los proyectos que estamos desarrollando

Desventajas

el tiempo de respuesta de los Bug, que se basen a los votos para atenderlos.

Nicolò Armando
Calificación general
  • Sector: Desarrollo de programas
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

A great product to enhance your applications

Revisado el 20/4/2020

Puntos a favor

You can find always a control for all your needs and it's also easy to use.
With this software you can implement features in seconds, that otherwise would require a good amount of time.

Desventajas

There isn't much to say about cons, because there aren't cons really.

Satheesh
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Professional product

Revisado el 16/4/2020

Customer support was fabulous. I got response on time

Puntos a favor

Not like other software, I got it fully functional with licence softer with full featured and professional look components. Which helps me to develop a professional and rich ui software

Desventajas

Nothing like that. Blazor is still not released from Microsoft. So features might be enhanced. However I am getting full support when I stuck with issue.

Timothy
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Syncfusion for the StartUp

Revisado el 23/3/2020

In addition to supporting Xamarin Forms, we are following a strict MVVM methodology and leveraging C# as much as possible across as many platforms as possible. Currently, this includes the most popular standard platforms that Xamarin Forms supports: iOS, Android, UWP. We will also be supporting Blazor (C# in browser web assembly) and one of the Syncfusion features we hope to leverage is their Blazor support. We are waiting for .NET 5 GA to leap into that part of the project, but are hopeful our good experience with Syncfusion componentson Xamarin Forms supported platforms will be matched in the Browser based client using Syncfusion Blazor components.

Puntos a favor

Our project is to build a commercial-grade, security-compliant, serverless mobile app platform using only tools that are budget-friendly for startups. Our tool-chain selection includes AWS services (API Gateway, Cognito, Lambda, DynamoDB, ...), Microsoft .NET Core/Standard, Visual Studio and Xamarin. All these tools are essentially free until your app starts scaling. Syncfusion's community edition was chosen because it provides commercial-grade features and doesn't burden the entrepreneur with out-of-pocket expenses until their app is generating revenue. Finally, our experience with Syncfusion's support has been first rate.

Desventajas

Syncfusion targets many different UI presentation layers. In our case, we use Xamarin Forms which is relatively new for Syncfusion. The controls are generally solid but do require more "code-behind" work than is generally recommended in the Xamarin community. There are shops that totally refuse to allow "any" code-behind and if you are one of those you may have some issues using all of the Syncfusion controls. In our case, the limited code-behind required is not considered a barrier. In addition, the Syncfusion documentation is obviously not written by a native English speaker and as such can be amusing at times and occasionally annoying .

Gianpietro
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Syncfusion helps me to be smart

Revisado el 2/4/2021

Puntos a favor

Richness and completeness of controls and good and quick support.

Desventajas

Examples in the github non always complete and clear, poor availability of code snippets.

Amos
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

review

Revisado el 25/4/2020

Very intriguing but sometimes a bit frustrating because of the small details you miss when implementing things.

Puntos a favor

Diversified features of the grid - has almost everything I needed from a grid.

Desventajas

Learning curve is steep as there are a lot of small tweaks one should know in order to achieve something.

Steven
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Good product

Revisado el 1/9/2021

Satisfactory

Puntos a favor

Conversion of word docs to pdf with ease

Desventajas

Having to obtain a new key for every version and/or bug fix
Conversion of word doc to pdf was buggy at first - tables were not converted properly

Feifan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios de información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Overall it is good

Revisado el 17/3/2020

Puntos a favor

It’s components provide many built in features, which makes the development easier. The support team is another plus. They are just great.

Desventajas

Community forum is a little hard to use.

Ronny
Calificación general
  • Sector: Medios de difusión
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Perfect for my needs

Revisado el 1/10/2022

I mainly use their Winforms GridControl. First steps are very easy but as soon as you are digging deeper, their online documentation (due to the massive amount of capabilities) is not sufficient and you must open a ticket with their support team. But that's not a problem because they respond in a timely fashion and have solved all my problems/questions. Overall I'm very satisfied with this product.

Puntos a favor

Due to the comprehensive Online Documentation and User Forum, the first and basic steps are easy to accomplish.

Desventajas

When updating to newer versions and/or updates it is very important that you follow the exact steps, as described in the corresponding documents. Otherwise you will end up in a situation where your app does no longer compile and run.

Ali
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Essential Studio

Revisado el 18/5/2020

Puntos a favor

the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

Desventajas

take time to learn to use it's not straightforward. first two months you need contact to support a lot.but the support team one of the best we work with them very fast.

Ed
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Syncfusion Rocks!

Revisado el 20/10/2022

Puntos a favor

Integration with our business processes was easy.

Desventajas

Some of the features differ from how they are entered or set within the actual application such as Excel and PowerPoint. And some of the features that I require in order to produce the desired output are not present.

Craig
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

One of the first companies to give entrepreneurial Software Developers a break.

Revisado el 11/8/2020

A great thing about the Syncfusion components is that they work in Xamarin. I can create mobile apps without changes. Xamarin did not generate a Windows app that I liked, so I build an app using Winforms that looks like the mobile apps. Syncfusion for Winforms allowed me to do this and share code with the mobile apps.

Puntos a favor

Six years ago, I started developing a large scale enterprise product. It required a lot of full stack development. It runs on Windows, Android and IOS. The infrastructures is all Docker containers. I am not a UI guy and didn’t have the time to build the UI components needed. Syncfusion components work well. Their generous licensing policies made using the tools possible.

Most impressive, is that I have received the same quality support as one of their paying customers. My system has architecture that I developed to solve a problem specific to my target industry. I did hit a bug that had not been seen before. Syncfusion’s support staff verified that the bug was in their code and issued a patch without argument. I can’t tell you how many times a company has told me “the software is not supposed to do that, so it’s not a bug”.

Desventajas

There are components that I found difficult to understand even after reading the doc. But it was more the task at hand then a problem with a component. For example: To use the Word functions to manipulate a Word file, you must understand how Word structures its documents. But a note to support always results in a sample. So, really there is nothing negative to say.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10

Html->Pdf Converter works well mostly, but could be easier to use for the cost

Revisado el 11/3/2021

Support could have been better - we encountered a critical bug (which was fixed quickly by the developers, no issue there) and we got from support a windows nuget package without native binaries (because the support portal can't upload > 50mb files apparently) in them, which we decided to repackage to linux (which is the platform we reported the bug on) and add the native binaries binaries - the version was also identical to a live version on nuget.org so we had to change that in the repackage to avoid conflicts too. The suggestion was to "Manually reference the dlls" which is a bit mad considering the effort already sunk into locating the native binaries originating from the nuget package, and the lack of transistive resolution etc...

Puntos a favor

It works, renders html correctly enough.

Desventajas

Non-platform independence for devops - requires package installation on deployment targets. Also requires manual setting of path to syncfusion binaries (that are in the nuget package!) at runtime.

Extra package e.g. Syncfusion.HtmlToPdf.Blink.Static.Linux could be created with a static compile to eliminate system dependencies and manage CVEs etc.

The code (which we have had to write ourselves) to locate the native binaries originating from the nuget package should be inside the syncfusion lib - there should be no argument to their path.

Also, while it might bloat the package, nuget supports separate native binaries per runtime [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] which would enable to create a single platform-independant nuget package - this would really lower the difficulty - especially in places like dotnet-script where you have no csproj to change the PackageReferences depending on the runtime!

Anthony
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

World Class Tools for Developing World Class Apps

Revisado el 18/6/2021

I am the CEO and Sr. Developer of my own company and since we generate < million annually in revenue we qualified for a free license (Awesome!). However, I also work for a corporation and was able to acquire a paid ES license because the tools had very much become a valuable part of our application development team.

Puntos a favor

Great set of Tools! But equally important I would say is the stellar support that you receive. ES also has a huge community so I've rarely had to reach out for support as there is usually documentation on whatever issue I am currently having already.

However I have been amazed that such a Enterprise Level company has a support team that actually gets back to you in a day or two with either code examples or a resolution! In my whole development career of over 15 years, I've never seen that level of dedicated support! Not from Microsoft, Google( Does Google even do support?) or any third party tool.

Desventajas

Integration into projects isn't bad... I just wish it was a little more streamlined especially into Visual Studio. I ended up going with the Nuget Package installation because the other proved to be buggy and problematic.

Olafur
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Feature-rich easy to implement product with amazing customer support

Revisado el 2/5/2020

This products solves almost all our needs along with the standard ui and productivity components on the platforms that we deliver solutions on. We are almost entirely an angular/typescript, asp.net core and Xamarin shop. This makes our life much simpler and the less complex and we are able to deliver multi-platform solutions quickly to the customer and make our own customer service more responsive.

Puntos a favor

This products solves almost all our needs along with the standard ui and productivity components on the platforms that we deliver solutions on. We are almost entirely an angular/typescript, asp.net core and Xamarin shop.

Desventajas

Sometimes the documentation and examples leave something to be desired but the very quick and responsive customer support more than compensates for that.

Sabrina
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Great components outstanding support

Revisado el 15/2/2020

I'm using both the WPF components and the Web components, both on ASP.Net MVC and .Net Core, The use of these components reduces dramatically the development time and they have a great support for tasks as exporting to excel, word, html, and importing from external source, they have great PDF management and Visualization components and Great components to manage Word and Excel documents.

Puntos a favor

The good documentation, many samples, easy to apply on our software, but most of all the outstanding support from the company that supplies a sample to solve a problem or any How To question. Is very attentive when a possible bug is pointed out and if it is a bug a fix is provided in a scheduled time.

Desventajas

the only thing I don't like much is that upgrading the desktop projects when I upgrade the libraries is a time consuming task. But I don't think there is a way to avoid this.

Gabriel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Aviación y aeroespacial
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Everything we need in the component suite

Revisado el 10/11/2020

Puntos a favor

+ Complete suite of UI controls for .NET and Xamarin.Forms. Also its includes report, pdf and others libraries. No other library is needed.
+ Support is great. Generally they bring a one week solution when an issue if found or a quick workaround.
+ Many samples and Documentation available.
+ Grid is great.

Desventajas

Sometimes there are some specific functionalities that we wanted but with some extra work we can cover them.

Alternativas consideradas

DevSuite
Barry
Calificación general
  • Sector: Deportes
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Fantastic Support & Functionality

Revisado el 5/11/2020

Puntos a favor

We use 10+ different Syncfusion controls from Essential Studio for Xamarin and they quite literally have become an Essential part of our mobile product. They allow us to provide a UI with much greater polish and depth of functionality than the stock Xamarin Forms components while maintaining all of the cross-platform benefits between iOS and Android. And the Syncfusion support has been stellar. They have gone above and beyond on multiple occasions to help us track down obscure issues, some of which ended-up being our fault. Very highly recommended!

Desventajas

Event handling in some of the components can be challenging to work with, and some of the components have some annoying quirks, but these are minor quibbles overall. The written documentation can be difficult to read in places, but at least they do have extensive documentation.

Funso
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Lots of featureses

Revisado el 29/4/2021

Very good experience

Puntos a favor

It is easy to implement and good support

Desventajas

Not easy to what you are looking for in documentation

Alternativas consideradas

App Builder

Razones para elegir Essential Studio

Business decision

Razones para cambiar a Essential Studio

Ease of use and community version
william
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

Good product, needs better documentation

Revisado el 19/7/2021

Work directly with the supplied controls and not using the UI for Essential Studio.

Puntos a favor

The span of features is impressive, and when operated out-of-the-box everything "works". Once past the licensing issues, it is easy to use within an application for normal, simple features and feature set combinations.

Desventajas

The documentation detailed how to implement several features for the Grid control. However, using the features resulted in unstable and inconsistent behavior in the UI. Working directly with support/development programmers from Syncfusion, found that there were several issues with timing within the control code and how to access the control API that were not documented. The result from the developer sessions was more complicated and very dissimilar to the published documentation for these features, but it finally started to work consistently.

Santosh
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Why SyncFusion?

Revisado el 13/3/2020

Puntos a favor

I have been using Telerik's controls for almost 10 years now before being introduced to SyncFusion.

I would have to say that the Community License is the greatest reason for me to switch from Telerik.

Currently I am working on Angular projects and I have only used SyncFusion's Angular controls but I have found that the controls are equal to or greater in quality to the Telerik controls.

The grid in particular is much easier to use and develop with; it has been a challenging learning curve to transition from the Telerik grid control only because I have had to map actions and events from one to the other.

I think if I did not have such a long history with the Telerik controls, I wouldn't have any issues in learning to use the SyncFusion controls. I found this to be true when working with controls I had not used before .

Desventajas

Other than issues transitioning code from Telerik to Syncfusion, I haven't found any cons for using SyncFusion.

Ryan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion is Great

Revisado el 17/2/2021

We use Syncfusion for PDF manipulation. It's great.

Puntos a favor

Great product and if you ever need any assistance their support is awesome.

Desventajas

We *do* occasionally run across bugs or broken features

Greg
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Syncfusion is my one stop shop for User Controls

Revisado el 18/11/2021

I have used Syncfusion controls for years with great success. I have built many project using both the Web Controls, as well as Blazor controls.

Puntos a favor

Syncfusion controls whether for the Web or any other platform are well built, well documented, and well supported. All three of these points are extremely vital to project success.

Desventajas

The thing is, if I ever have an issue, I get ahold of online support and they help us out right away. They always help me find the correct way to use a control, and give me a sample to help the process along. In some cases, they will even update their own code to support a feature I think is important.

Mikael
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 0.0 /10

Blazor components

Revisado el 5/3/2021

The only component I still use from Syncfusion is a pivotgrid and html editor.

Puntos a favor

The components at first looks like they have plenty of functionality. If you are fine by using them in read only mode (no interaction needed) they might be very useful to you. They look good to the user, have localisation support etc.

Desventajas

Buggy components. Implementation requires a lot more code than similar components on the market. E.g you had to specify TItem type explicitly for grids and comboboxes. If not given the components fail to load on empty data resulting in Blazor app crash.

We decided to switch to Devexpress.

Respuesta de Syncfusion Traducir a Español

Dear Mikael,

Thanks for this feedback on your experience. I'm sorry to hear you ran into difficulties.

My understanding is that 1 issue was resolved in our last release, but I can appreciate that may not have come in time for it to be helpful.

Your comments have been shared w/ our technical team so they can be factored into future quarterly releases. The tentative roadmap for our next version is at https://www.syncfusion.com/products/roadmap/ - several Blazor grid & PDF viewer improvements are noted. I'm not certain which items made it, but once ES 2021 Volume 1 is available details will be at https://www.syncfusion.com/products/whatsnew. I hope you'll keep an eye out in case they give you cause to take a 2nd look at the controls you've phased out use of.

I'm glad you've had a positive service experience & I hope you'll continue to come to us w/ any issues - or feature requests. Thanks again for your input it'll help us make our controls the best they can be.

Best,
Sierra

Avgerinos
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la reseña

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

Many features and functionallity but too "buggy"

Revisado el 28/4/2020

Puntos a favor

Pretty easy to use the controls, and also many options in customizing and extending them.

Desventajas

Too many bugs in almost every control that we've used. Exception handling is missing in many critical points that causes many - many application crashes.
Each time a new release came out and we've decided to upgrade, new bugs came out. It seems like the controls are never tested in real life complex scenarios but only in demo examples that use very basic options.
At very least, even if a bug appears a error should be thrown in the UI instead of terminating the whole application that leads in bad user experience.