Opiniones de Hired

I like that candidates are primed to interview and eager to find a new role. It's easy to use, adds candidates frequently, and is overall my favorite platform!

I like using it to find candidates. I could do without some of the back-end work (like marking when a candidate has interviewed) etc.

Resume search and filtering was really user friendly compare to other alternatives.

Multiple resume selection could be hard sometimes but other than that now issues.

Easy to navigate around the page and there are a lot of features when sourcing for a candidate.

Not as many candidates for certain roles. Seems that I only use it for more technical roles.

very simple way to do a background check

too easy that there's not that many functions and takes too long to get background check

The software really streamlines the entire process by emphasizing transparency. I've been on both ends of the platform (business side and candidate side), and the product is very easy to use - pretty much set it and forget it (until you get matches to review). Customer service is great, as well!

The company has gone through a lot of change in the last year and a half, and we're not seeing a heavy focus on just engineering roles. While this product is great, it's pretty limited in the roles you're trying to fill, which is going to make it tough for Hired as LinkedIn continues to expand and grow.

The candidates that came through it were very high quality and the software is very easy to use and understand.

I feel like there are some weird ways to do things within the UI, they just don't seem very intuitive.

Good quality candidates, easy to use and reasonable fee.

Basic features and customer service not easy to readily access

Even if my experience was very bad, I can say that the UI of the website is very good and that it's great.

I was not convinced by Hired: I tried the website two times and I never got access to it. This website wants to make hiring an elitist process... and it does not work.

They have a lot of engaged candidates and most of them respond to you. Regardless of a positive or negative response, it's always nice to have people respond to your inquiries.

If you're looking for a full stack/backend/front end engineer then this place has a ton of them. If it's anything specific then a traditional team search would be more appropriate..

The quality of people us to be better. For some reason, the folks who I am talking to now feel like they haven't really been vetted by anybody. I've even seen some suspicious resume in the site.

Easy to see line up pf candidates and send them a message, also very easy to schedule interviews. I like that it syncs with my google calendar automatically.

Very hard to review a comprehensive account of people contacted, rejected, interviewed by myself. The list only goes down as far as last 10-15 people contacted.

Candidate are very responsive. Platform is transparent both for candidates and companies.

Some candidates don't completely fill out their profiles. Some markets / jobs don't have sufficient candidate pipelines but that is to be expected.

The UI/UX of the platform is great - it's simple, to the point, and very easy to follow. The quality of candidates is also top notch and it's helpful that there are Client Success Managers that help you every step of the way.

Sometimes it becomes a bit of a bidding war between other companies on the platform, but not unlike real life bidding situations off of candidates from linkedin.

The platform is easy to use and allows for more streamlined conversations with talented technical talent. The integration with our ATS system makes things efficient from our perspective.

While the system is great to use, the feature that requires salary information to be transparent has caused inflation in salaries and a bidding war that is not warranted on actual experience. The platform is too expensive in general for what it is as well.

I love the easy-to-use functionality of the software. The customer success is amazing as well... Our Account Manager and Customer Success reps are always there when we need them.

I wish we could still find a number of different roles, rather than JUST technical-focused roles. We do a lot of sales hiring, but understand why this is no longer a functionality for the software.

I've primarily been more on the hardware/firmware side of recruiting in the past and never utilized this tool as much. Switching to software in 2018, I've really changed my stance on the quality of the product. The visibility into candidates as well a MUCH better response rate vs. Linkedin makes this a must-have product for technical recruiting teams.

The search functionaltiy could improve.

I like we get high-quality candidates and the easy functionality of moving recs through the pipeline.

Some of my harder to find recs have zero candidates.

It is a fairly straight forward tool to use. User interface is good, user experience is straight forward

Quality of candidates is not consistently high

Ease of use, great ATS integration, I like the scheduling features

Lacking some customizable options/notifcations. I dont like that I automaticallt get remote candidates since our business cannot accommodate them

Ease of connecting with candidates and sharing communications internally. Candidates can easily reach out to companies they're interested in. Overall, high quantity and quality of candidates.

Can be difficult to search for a specific candidate. Scheduling is difficult to change (has to go through Hired).

Easy to use
Easy to filter
Relatively high quantity of candidates

Ultimately, the average quality of candidates is not in fact significantly higher than can be gotten elsewhere