Phabricator

4,1 (17)
¡Escribe una opinión!
Herramienta de gestión de proyectos y desarrollo de software de código abierto

Calificación general

4,1 /5
(17)
Relación calidad-precio
4,4/5
Funcionalidades
3,9/5
Facilidad de uso
4,1/5
Asistencia al cliente
3,7/5

76%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

17 opiniones

Mark
Mark
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Phabricator is the best hands down

Revisado el 28/10/2020

Super useful software, that's really well built with the option to make it more serious or leave...

Super useful software, that's really well built with the option to make it more serious or leave little developer quips in.

Puntos a favor

Phabricator makes it really easy for you to move from setup to creating tasks and projects. It's secure, open source, multi-functional and honestly just amazing.

Desventajas

Not all the features are available right away, so it does require a little configuration to ensure it works the way you want it to.

Alternativas consideradas

Jira

Razones para elegir Phabricator

When I learned that Facebook uses Phabricator internally, I knew there must be a reason so I tried it out and never looked.

Razones para cambiar a Phabricator

Staying with Bugzilla wasn't really an option, while fully functional it does have some notable short-comings, kan-ban boards being just one of them. JIRA is just too complex a product in my opinion, plus it can become frustratingly slow.
Earlie
Calificación general
  • Sector: Recursos Humanos
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Better than Github

Revisado el 30/3/2021

Definitely a great experience. I would recommend Phabricator to all my friends who work in...

Definitely a great experience. I would recommend Phabricator to all my friends who work in different industries.

Puntos a favor

I really like the interface of Phabricator. It's definitely user friendly.

Desventajas

The search engine can be improved when searching for this.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Juegos de ordenador
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

A powerful tool that needs fine tuning

Revisado el 1/8/2019

I'm happy with the solution, but I sometime feel frustrated not being able to address/find proper...

I'm happy with the solution, but I sometime feel frustrated not being able to address/find proper solutions to what seems to be simple/common situations for this kind of tool

Puntos a favor

Phabricator is an easy to implement and free tool, that can be used as a task/bug manager/tracker. It's pretty versatile and offers various pre-installed tools/plugins, with a lot of possible parameters to play with in order to create Projects, related tasks and link this to your repository solution (we are using Git).
It offers the possibility to work with lists or board (kan-ban style), it has a free sprint plug-in that allows to Phabricator to be used as a scrum tool.
Being free and stand-alone, it allows integrators/developers to come up with their own scripts and/or plugins.

Desventajas

It's a bit confusing at first, since the information can be presented in different style, at different places and, therefore, can be interpreted in different ways. The development is slow and a lot of features requested by paying customers as much as free users seem to take a long time before being addressed. It's understandable but could be a downer for potential users.
The community behind it is not as active as other solutions, so finding a solution to your problem could take time and effort.

Srinivasa Ashok
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Phabricator is phab....it's simply awesome

Revisado el 2/12/2022

I mostly use phabricator on Post-release of applications and also project management with front-end...

I mostly use phabricator on Post-release of applications and also project management with front-end and back-end developers. The application sets the importance of my use case and can go deeper in thought. It made my decision-making capacity easier.

Puntos a favor

1) Creating tasks with the roadmap2) Ticket management with active repositories3) Diffusion4) Tasks assignment5) project management with larger dev team

Desventajas

1) Can develop the best user interface2) rarely they update the software

Rijn
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Must have if use monorepo

Revisado el 3/2/2022

Puntos a favor

Phabricator is a great tool for medium to large company. It provides everything need for a large group of engineers and is perfect for monorepo.

Desventajas

It doesn't have a good per-repo permission control or customization.

Justin
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 2.0 /10

Maximal pain for minimal gain

Revisado el 16/3/2021

For a free service, Phabricator is okay, but realize that Phacility, its parent company, is largely...

For a free service, Phabricator is okay, but realize that Phacility, its parent company, is largely a one-man show. I wouldn't entrust my company's productivity to something with that sort of "bus factor."

Be aware that if you *are* using Phabricator because it's free, Phacility doesn't respond to any feedback from you. Which I suppose is fair, given that it has to make money somehow.

I have trouble thinking of reasons to use Phabricator over integrated platforms like GitLab (and even GitHub) that offer a more comprehensive, more thoroughly documented, more robustly backed experience.

Puntos a favor

Phabricator is entirely open source, so there's no need to worry about licensing fees. It supports multiple version control systems, which may be helpful in mixed environments. Its rule engine for notifications, Herald, allows us to set up complex notification schemes based on specific criteria.

Desventajas

I have fundamental problems with the way that Phabricator is designed.

First, Phabricator is deployed as a Git repository and extensive amounts of manual setup. No easy deployment and upgrades for you! GitLab, which is a significantly bigger project, can be deployed as a single Linux package. This wouldn't be so painful if Phabricator's documentation was up to snuff, but it isn't. There are many aspects of Phabricator that are entirely undocumented.

Phabricator relies on users using Arcanist, a PHP-based client-side tool that wraps around version control commands. PHP? And no packages? Really? While ostensibly designed to make code review easier, it basically just ends up complicating everything because nobody who comes in has ever worked with it.

Phabricator's interface is incredibly confusing. It tries to be cute by assigning creative names to different services, but they're so confusingly named that new hires often have no idea what a service is actually for.

Because it isn't an integrated platform like GitHub or GitLab, it doesn't provide the same sort of experience as these services.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Phabricator - Full featured Diff Reviews

Revisado el 16/3/2021

Puntos a favor

Its not just the diff being reviewed, its wrapped between all the contextual info as well.
- Phabricator does a great job surfacing all the information like passing/failing tests
- Your git stack is avaialble as part of the diff review, lets you see how the feature is evolving

As close to pair programming as it gets at a distance.

Desventajas

The setup can be a bit complicated given you want to host your codebase on the web.
To take full advantage of a CI features, you'll wire up the unit tests and deployment machines to test each diff and how it affects the big picture.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Internet
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Esy development, old techniques

Revisado el 22/9/2022

Puntos a favor

I started iwth this to handle several projects and host several application, it was easy to install and configure

Desventajas

No longer maintened, it has an old structure and not enough new features implemented by competitors

Ravi
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

My favourite code review too

Revisado el 17/9/2020

Overall, I have enjoyed phabricator more than any of the alternatives I have used — it makes code...

Overall, I have enjoyed phabricator more than any of the alternatives I have used — it makes code review feel intuitive and lightweight; and integrate it in my daily workflow.

Puntos a favor

The ability to view code side-by-side; intelligent diff calculation; macros make reviewing fun; simple, intuitive and easy to understand state machine for the commit

Desventajas

Features outside of code review and browsing code are quite rudimentary, and as a result I end up using other tools for task management, etc.

Ahmad
Ahmad
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10

No live update make this tool frustrating

Revisado el 29/8/2018

Puntos a favor

Works very smooth and has little to no issues performance wise

Desventajas

UI is meh, no auto refreshes or auto updates on boards make it frustrating. I have to manually refresh the page in order to see comments on tickets

Pranav
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Simple and efficient

Revisado el 6/8/2020

It's been good. Has most things in one tool (tasks, project management, code review, code explorer,...

It's been good. Has most things in one tool (tasks, project management, code review, code explorer, paste bin etc).

Puntos a favor

It's simple.
Things work well within the system. You can refer objects by just their ids.
Code review is easy.
Task and project management is simple
Very good command line support

Desventajas

I love it.
The only thing that others may not like is that it's not as full featured as JIRA. But that may be a feature

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Telecomunicaciones
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

A fantastic way to improve product and process areas.

Revisado el 16/3/2021

Puntos a favor

I loved that I was able to escalate issues with local geographic issues to a global team.

Desventajas

The CX is not the best if you're outside of a software engineering position. But it helped improve processes in a global company for me.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Propiedad inmobiliaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado Otro durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 3.0 /10

For Engineers

Revisado el 7/1/2020

I avoided having to use it if at all possible and am glad we moved to Trello

I avoided having to use it if at all possible and am glad we moved to Trello

Puntos a favor

We used this software to help our company get organized with ordering supplies and keeping up with employee needs.

Desventajas

It was not easy to use. The engineers found it very useful for their flow, but regular employees had a hard time navigating and understanding how to make requests using the system

Brian
Brian
Calificación general
  • Sector: Juegos de ordenador
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

best tool to use for Tech stacks

Revisado el 16/3/2021

Puntos a favor

Phabricator has such a large array of tools for coding I can test everything inside their suite.

Desventajas

I haven't had any major issues using phabricator to work with my code and the fact that is free and open-sourced means fewer updates on the program itself.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Internet
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

go-to change management tool

Revisado el 16/3/2021

Puntos a favor

easy to use great open source option for code submission and review tool for code changes and approval processes

Desventajas

github has a free trial for sampling the software and has beeter infrastructure automation offerings

Jonathan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
  • Software usado Otro durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Engineers

Revisado el 25/12/2019

It's a good product to have all of the bug reports in one place.

It's a good product to have all of the bug reports in one place.

Puntos a favor

Good tool for users to contact and work with Engineers. Since Engineers might be staring at lines of code for hours, they will be slow to respond to emails. This is a good tool to contact them.

Desventajas

It looks very dated. It can be very hard to maneuver around if you are not familiar with the interface.

Rodrigo Ernesto
Calificación general
  • Sector: Seguros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

Revisado el 3/12/2018