
Calificación general
Filtrar
Tamaño de la empresa
Tiempo usado
1002 opiniones
- Sector: Ingeniería industrial o mecánica
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Gestion de proyectos y codigo
Revisado el 22/11/2022
Puntos a favor
Muy facil de organizar, permite subgrupos
Desventajas
Version en continuo cambio, equipos limitados a 5 personas
- Sector: Formación profesional y coaching
- Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Gran manejo de gestiones de tareas implementadas.
Revisado el 11/8/2023
Gran herramienta de tareas implementadas, formenta muy acordé a lo establecido en cada proyecto.
Gran herramienta de tareas implementadas, formenta muy acordé a lo establecido en cada proyecto.
Puntos a favor
GitLab , tiene grandes potencias de informes y análisis de trabajo requerido en cuestiones de seguridad de datos , nos a aportado mucho beneficios de herramientas útiles para mantenerse seguro te n nuestras tareas.
Desventajas
Maneja algunas herramientas en la API que no ejecuta en la automatización de nuestro sistema. Pero se a permanecido estable en la seguridad de datos.
- Sector: Automatización industrial
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Exelente alternativa a Github
Revisado el 18/12/2022
Puntos a favor
Lo que más me gusta de Gitlab es que puedo crear un servidor privado y así me aseguro de tener el control de mis datos.
Desventajas
En general todo está bien con GitLab, pero si tengo que mencionar algo sería la de optimizar las imágenes Docker para que no demanden muchos recursos.
Alternativas consideradas
BitbucketSoftware anterior
GitHub- Sector: Consultoría de gestión
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Para mi el rey de todas las plataformas de DevOps
Revisado el 6/1/2023
Puntos a favor
Lo uso a diario desde que empecé mi carrera profesional. Gran facilidad de uso, creación de tickets y de progresos, ramas...
Desventajas
Al principio, si nunca has utilizado una herramienta de este tipo puede ser un poco complicado hasta que te haces a ella, la implementas en otros softwares...
- Sector: Recursos Humanos
- Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10
Útil en el día a día
Revisado el 16/6/2023
Puntos a favor
Me resulta muy útil en mi día a día, desde que lo hemos empezado a utilizar hemos optimizado el trabajo.
Desventajas
No hay nada que no nos guste por ahora sobre su uso.

- Sector: Comercio minorista
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
GitLab is a must for development teams
Revisado el 10/7/2020
Puntos a favor
I love the Boards for tracking Issues in their life cycle. Customizable Columns and Labels make it quick and easy to see where an Issue is, giving a high level for management and the rest of the team, while having all the details and attached code branches and merge requests for the developer and stakeholders. I love how it's able to connect code from several projects to Issues, no matter where they live, so you can have as many boards and projects as you like! It's well put together and seems natural with everything I try to do organization-wise. Integrates really well with developers' workflows.
Desventajas
GitLab is always improving and enables you to request features, so if you want something, suggest it and they'll get to it! Sometimes that's a bit slow, but you can usually work around it.

- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
GitLab Review
Revisado el 26/9/2019
GitLab resolved our version controlling problems, code review problems. It helps to maintain our...
GitLab resolved our version controlling problems, code review problems. It helps to maintain our code standards very easily. We can setup It on our local server also very easily. It is free anyone can try it.
Puntos a favor
GitLab is a superb source code managemanet provide. It is free. We can install it in our privet server also. As well as we can use their server with a free account. We use git for version control. GitLab provides awesome support for version control. It is a very easy tool. Anyone can use it very easily If someone has no more knowledge about versioning but He can use GitLab very easy. We can maintain our Repositories/Branchers. User access level also there. Currently, We use GitLab. We maintain feature branches, dev branch, and master branch. Everyone does not allow to merge code to the dev branch. If someone add merge request to the dev branch, our one-person review code and merge. Then we use GitLab it is easy for us. GitLab provides superb dashboard it very easy to review code. It shows all code changes with file by file. Easy to compare. As well as we can compare two branches vary easy. It provides a clear, unique, user-friendly dashboard. GitLab also supports CI/CD process. It's superb we can recommend for anyone. If our commit has some conflict it shows how to resolve that step by step.
Desventajas
When I add a new commit. If the file is large/have many lines. It not showing code changes directly. It shows a message file has many lines cannot show changes that kind of message. Sometimes when we compare two commits. It not more clear. Some times confusing. If I show some file history only show commits. not showing code changes by commits. We want to go and check every commits to show changes.
Razones para cambiar a GitLab
It's free. We can setup on our local servers. It provides an easy, powerful, clear, and userfriendly dashboard. Its same thing wants for version control. Its there on GitLab.- Sector: Seguridad informática y de redes
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
GitLab, the one stop for development
Revisado el 8/9/2023
Puntos a favor
Intigration of source control, documentation, and ticketing
Desventajas
Wish there was more options for on-prem installation
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Source control is made easy with gitlab
Revisado el 22/10/2019
We need to control our source code. We need to know exactly who has changed what line of code at...
We need to control our source code. We need to know exactly who has changed what line of code at what point. And git, nice though it is, needs a GUI. Gitlab provides us that GUI.
Puntos a favor
The software is stable.
Updates come out regularly.
SSO integration with our AD is very nice.
Desventajas
We are using gitlab not only for our source code, but also to control the configuration of all of our servers and firewalls. It would be nice if we could schedule scripts on gitlab to run automatically. We are now 'abusing' the pipelines for this purpose.
Alternativas consideradas
Helix CoreRazones para elegir GitLab
It's quite unfair to compare gitlab to visualSVN. Gitlab is an integrated issue tracker and source code management system.Razones para cambiar a GitLab
The staff just wanted to use git and gitlab. We did not want to host in GitHub since we want to be in control of our own data.- Sector: Aerolíneas/aviación
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
GitLab- Great product for DevOps Lifecycle
Revisado el 11/7/2023
Overall it’s a better option than Github for continuous integration.
Overall it’s a better option than Github for continuous integration.
Puntos a favor
GitLab would be a great choice for people working in private projects for self- hosted repositories when compared to other product like Github . Also good for tracking issues throughout the CI/CD pipelines.
Desventajas
Speed is less when compared to Github when pushing or pulling source codes. Also the cost is more when compared to the other products.
- Sector: Estudios de mercado
- Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Gitlab CI/CD , SCM
Revisado el 22/12/2022
the best available CI?CD tool along with SAST scanners in built and all auto devops pipelines. I...
the best available CI?CD tool along with SAST scanners in built and all auto devops pipelines. I enjoy working with this tool and configuring it.
Puntos a favor
The best available CI/CD and SCM tool available compared to industry best github. We use EKS deployments specially from a fully generated CI?CD auto devops pipeline in gitlab and there are various features gitlab leveraged in sdlc of a product .
Desventajas
The advanced search functionality could improve better and devops metrics can be improved. We need search functionality for regular premium users to go through files and search for a string and all.
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para cambiar a GitLab
Github didn't have devops features when we started working on gitlab- Sector: Consultoría de gestión
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
An excellent Source Code Tool
Revisado el 5/5/2023
Quite happy with it. Coming from a very strong technical background myself, there were the usual...
Quite happy with it. Coming from a very strong technical background myself, there were the usual set of core features I was expecting, and it does those well. Plus, it allows me to have a good overview of things at a higher level (since I do know the tech stuff), without having to compromise the repository in any way. In brief, suits my needs well.
Puntos a favor
Does what one would expect from any modern code repository and does it with a great intuitive interface. This is often an overlooked requirement, which GitLab does very well. The interface is intuitive and allows the user to do their job with minimal fuss and just get on with it.
Desventajas
The commercial pricing tiers can be a bit on the high side, and it can add up with many users - which can be just a bit daunting for growing organizations, but it can be handled if properly budgeted. Also, at times it can be slower than expected, but it's a fairly minor annoyance in my experience.
Razones para cambiar a GitLab
It offers a fresh new take on things, a great interface with good flexibility and the team were eager to move in a new direction.- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
gitlab - aptly as they say that the world stores its code and provides features.
Revisado el 2/2/2023
my experience has been a productive one.
my experience has been a productive one.
Puntos a favor
what i like most is that it is a integrated platform for web development and distributed version control system which powers superior developer experience.
Desventajas
what i like least is the security features which are inbuilt are confusing to configure during authentication and no analytics for pipeline tracking.
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para elegir GitLab
For it's user friendly and it's easy to use in CICD.Software anterior
GitHubRazones para cambiar a GitLab
For it's user friendly and it's easy to use in CICD .- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
De facto for Source Control
Revisado el 8/2/2023
Puntos a favor
Easy source control and collaboration for software tasks, and best in class management for debugging changes and tasks
Desventajas
Inviting collaborators into an existing project is a little tedious and error prone
- Sector: Marketing y publicidad
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Prueba gratis
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
Great set of tools
Revisado el 27/7/2023
GitLab fascinates me because it allows small businesses like mine to access this toolset and create...
GitLab fascinates me because it allows small businesses like mine to access this toolset and create their own facility.
Puntos a favor
It is wonderful for version control, being an extremely easy tool to handle. It provides a great dashboard able to review the codes and show all changes one by one.
Desventajas
I like the app overall, but its updates are a bit complicated to apply.
- Sector: Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Gitlab review
Revisado el 9/4/2023
We really like GitLab, we were able to use it for fully automated development procedure which saves...
We really like GitLab, we were able to use it for fully automated development procedure which saves us large amount of time and help us to isolate the bugs before switching to production.
Puntos a favor
Gitlab gives us sufficient features to support source code management, user administration and Continuous integration for reasonable pricing
Desventajas
There is really nothing in my mind which I specifically do not like about the GitLab but If there would be room for improvement, We would appreciate more features for CI/CD integration testing.
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para elegir GitLab
We transit after the Github was acquired from Microsoft. We were not sure which path GitHub will takes after the acquisition. the transition to GitLab was super easy and safe solution.Software anterior
GitHubRazones para cambiar a GitLab
pricing and security features- Sector: Marketing y publicidad
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
A discrete item in your toolkit
Revisado el 10/3/2020
It is easy to use and don't impose itself it's own way to proceed.
At some point gitlab.com had...
It is easy to use and don't impose itself it's own way to proceed.
At some point gitlab.com had big performances issues, it was very slow. Even posting a simple issue was a pain. Those issues got fixed and it is now very fast. In case of maintenance or temporary issues, they have a very transparent way of proceeding and we always receive alerts and/or post mortems.
Puntos a favor
You just forget about Gitlab. As it provide a whole devops toolkit, it integrates discretely in your workflow. It doesn't require training, and if needed for advanced use, it got an extensive documentation as any open source tool should have. The UI makes it easy to use without thinking about it. What you don't understand first, you'll find an usage if needed on day.
The fact it got integrated CI/CD is incredible. I am very reluctant to Docker technologies and wouldn't beat myself to deal with them, but I really like them the way they are integrated in the CI/CD: it makes possible to test the applications in a very efficient and simple maneer and improve the overall quality and security of my products.
Desventajas
What I really don't like is that, if it is possible do deactivate some feature of a repository because you don't use them, there are some that overload the UI and you cannot remove them because Gitlab use it as a way to make you upgrade to the next plan.
- Sector: Internet
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Customizable management system for any project
Revisado el 24/2/2022
GitLab is overall a better alternative to GitHub and clearly suitable for experts who already have...
GitLab is overall a better alternative to GitHub and clearly suitable for experts who already have experience in versioning processes. Especially for academic processes, in which small steps are important, versioning through GitLab is easy to integrate into technical work processes. Likewise the adaptability to own needs is extremely simple by the CI. Particularly when it comes to the area of machine learning, for example, the registry or the CI enables the integration and management of trained models or, through the integration of GPU servers, the training of these without having to use a new platform such as Google Colab.
Puntos a favor
GitLab is easy to use and offers a versatile range of applications. GitLab can be used not only for software development projects. Especially in the academic sector, institutions can use GitLab to persist the respective work steps and research data, data in general, and workflows. Version control is particularly helpful in this regard, as it allows each step of a work to be traced, and errors to be undone directly without having to do a great deal of extra work.
In addition, GitLab can be customized and the respective instances can be easily transferred to one's own infrastructure. The development team is also always open to new ideas and actually incorporates them.
GitLab is therefore not only suitable for software development, but for any form of project in which it is a matter of the step-by-step tracking of work steps.
Desventajas
GitLab can be quite overwhelming. It is particularly difficult for non-experts from the non-software sector to get to know the processes of GitLab, as GitLab is less focused on gamification aspects compared to GitHub. Therefore, a high level of preparatory work and expertise is required in GitLab. Likewise, GitLab is often very technical, which is understandable, but it would be quite conceivable that especially in the area of testing and CI, modular principles, like for websites, would be conceivable and desirable.
Razones para cambiar a GitLab
Compared to GitHub, GitLab is much more customizable and suitable for experts. Compared to Google Drive, the versioning principle is convincing. Google Drive as a pure data storage is insufficient for larger, more traceable projects.
- Sector: Internet
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
The best opensource tool for software engineering management
Revisado el 26/5/2021
We're hosting all of our private code repositories on gitlab.com, using the issue tracker, merge...
We're hosting all of our private code repositories on gitlab.com, using the issue tracker, merge requests. We also run our continuos builds and deploy directly to our Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine workloads.
Puntos a favor
It's opensource though provides a cloud based solution with a really good free tier. It allows integrating code repositories with issue tracking and continuos integration and continuos deployment
Desventajas
User experience could be largely improved. Searching and filters are a bit clunky from the UX point of view. Also bulk actions are only allowed at project level.
Alternativas consideradas
JiraRazones para elegir GitLab
We wanted to have issue tracking, code repositories, merge requests and continuos integration/deployment all in the same tool.Razones para cambiar a GitLab
It was the best alternative for our budget, and it allowed us to use our own Google Cloud Platform account to run Continuos Integration/Deployment jobs- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
The All-in-One orchestration tool for CICD
Revisado el 11/2/2021
Overall, I am very pleased with the GitLab experience since it provides a single stop window for...
Overall, I am very pleased with the GitLab experience since it provides a single stop window for developers and admins
Puntos a favor
GitLab provides all-in-one capability for developers to do Source Code Management, CI/CD automation, Security and coding standards checks. Earlier we used to have separate tools for each of the above functions, but moving to Gitlab we now have a single stop-shop for all our Application Development and Automation needs. I see many other companies are trying to follow the gitlab methodology but gitlab is way ahead of the competetion.
Desventajas
Project and Portfolio management can still have improvements to provide Roadmap and Grantt views in future versions
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para elegir GitLab
Moving to a single stop window instead of disparate toolsRazones para cambiar a GitLab
GitHub has just started GitHub actions and will take at least a year to provide similar capabilities- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
A serious contender in the Self Host GIT space
Revisado el 20/12/2022
It's really nice to have it, and the fact they were the first to allow for free private repositories...
It's really nice to have it, and the fact they were the first to allow for free private repositories is a nice gesture
Puntos a favor
For us, it was crucial to be able to self host an instance to have it totally off grid and Gitlab delivered beautifully
Desventajas
A bit obscure to setup, and updates can be quite time consuming as we cannot do them as often as would be required by the project
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para elegir GitLab
GIT has a much better workflow for managing branchesSoftware anterior
Apache SubversionRazones para cambiar a GitLab
Self hosting was key- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
GitLab one of the best code versoinnig tools
Revisado el 3/5/2023
GitLab has a large and active community of contributors who help maintain and improve the platform
GitLab has a large and active community of contributors who help maintain and improve the platform
Puntos a favor
GitLabprovides a complete end-to-end solution for software development, from source code management and version control to deployment and monitoring. This can be very convenient for teams who want to consolidate their development workflow in a single platform.
Desventajas
One potential limitation is the complexity of the platform. While GitLab's comprehensive feature set can be a strength, it can also make the platform more challenging to use and configure, especially for smaller teams or organizations.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Awesome Git Service
Revisado el 2/5/2019
Puntos a favor
GitLab is a great place to host git repositories - for both private and commercial use. With its pretty and intuitive design, GitLab offers a great experience to work with. Collaboration is managed in a really great way.
Their pricing is also amazing: it's mostly free to use. We've had multiple private repos on GitLab for years now and haven't had any reason to upgrade to a paid plan so far.
Desventajas
GitLab's customer support team is really slow at responding to support requests. However, since I'm on a free plan, that's okay and I think they probably allocate all of their support resources to their paying users - and that's totally fine.
Razones para cambiar a GitLab
We first hosted all our repos on Bitbucket, but GitLab allowed us to add more users to our repositories for free. It also offered more integrations such as Sentry which was a big selling point for us. GitHub didn't offer free private repos at the time which was the main reason we went for GitLab instead.- Sector: Juegos de ordenador
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Very solid Git server
Revisado el 18/7/2019
Very satisfied and will consider it also for the next professional projects.
Very satisfied and will consider it also for the next professional projects.
Puntos a favor
The installation is pretty straight forward and easy. It's the only free git server solution I found that offers LFS support. We started our project without the support of Git LFS but as the project grew, we had to find a solution and transfer our repository to an LFS ready server. GitLab offered the perfect solution, allowing us to keep our existing SSH keys for authentication, existing LDAP users and transfer our existing project pretty easily. Since then, we never ran into issues and the server is running smoothly since the first day.
Desventajas
The server is based on RoR so it's heavier than a simple Git Server. You need to make sure you have enough resources to get it to run properly.
Alternativas consideradas
GitHubRazones para cambiar a GitLab
SSH authentication + LFS, installed on our own server.- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
Version control for private companies
Revisado el 20/6/2021
I find the interface a bit complex, but once I got my hands on it, I got used to it and I simply...
I find the interface a bit complex, but once I got my hands on it, I got used to it and I simply prefer it over Github.
Puntos a favor
The software includes version control, container storage, issue tracker, grouping and goals. All of these provides great experience for a developer.
Desventajas
I don't like the interface, it looks too professional. Something more playful would be highly appreceated.