Favro

4,4 (417)
¡Escribe una opinión!
Planificación todo en uno y aplicación de colaboración.

Calificación general

4,4 /5
(417)
Relación calidad-precio
4,1/5
Funcionalidades
4,1/5
Facilidad de uso
4,2/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,3/5

90%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

417 opiniones

Carlos Andrés
Carlos Andrés
Calificación general
  • Sector: Logística y cadena de suministro
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 3.0 /10

La prueba gratuita no me gustó

Revisado el 6/12/2022

En general, Me encanta la facilidad de uso pero podría tener más funciones como agregar mas...

En general, Me encanta la facilidad de uso pero podría tener más funciones como agregar mas plantillas o la automatización avanzada, entre otras cosas.En la interfaz del software, hay muchas opciones en todas partes, son complicadas de usar, en mi opninión no se ven agradables.

Puntos a favor

Me gustó poder registrarme para una prueba gratuita antes de comprometerme a comprar el software y lo que más me gustó es el hecho de que tiene tantas herramientas , funciones y muchas formas de personalizarlo!!!

Desventajas

En mi opinión, favro es muy fácil y simple de usar pero a diferencia de mí, hay personas que se le dificulta adaptarse al software, ellos deben tomarse unos minutos con el software para saber como usarla o en caso contrario ver los tutoriales; bueno, las plantillas son muy útiles, pero creo que debería haber otras opciones disponibles.

Alternativas consideradas

Zoho Projects, Wimi, monday.com, ClickUp y Asana
Jonas
Jonas
Calificación general
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente

Smooth and good looking, with all the features needed!

Revisado el 29/3/2018

Puntos a favor

The great overview with multiple backlogs and boards. Also the collections suitable for several teams using collaborative features. Perfect for a team using scrum or kanban methods.

Desventajas

No easy way to edit the text styling in the description. Missing some integrations with for example Harvest and Forecast.

Vincentas
Vincentas
Calificación general
  • Sector: Inalámbrico
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Trello on Steroids

Revisado el 26/7/2019

Puntos a favor

More powerful project management tool then trello
The fact that you can link cards across different projects
Multiple possibilities to customize and integrate

Desventajas

We tried to use in a way it was not supposed to be used. After all nuances were aired out - Favro became useful and convenient

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Automoción
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Review Title

Revisado el 10/11/2018

I think Favro is great although could use improvements such as being neater when adding a list of...

I think Favro is great although could use improvements such as being neater when adding a list of links to the description. It would be great if there was more automation involved such as if I put a card in the done section on my board, then it could automatically appear in the to-do colomn of the next teams board who would need to work on it.

Puntos a favor

I really like how I can see what projects I have worked on and that it is clear what I am currently doing, what I've finished, and what is coming up for me.

Desventajas

For a given project, I wish there were separat check lists for different people so managers could see how far along a single person is. I also wish it was easier for managers to use since my current teams project managers seem to have a hard time using it. Integration with Basecamp and Project Tracker would be something I think they would like. For me it would be nice if a card said which board and which stage it was on if it was in more than one board. I know it already says this in the comments but it would be cool if it said it in one place intead of just the comments.

Delgado
Delgado
Calificación general
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Excellent tools for project management

Revisado el 18/5/2018

We have improved our administration in our projects, we will continue using it

We have improved our administration in our projects, we will continue using it

Puntos a favor

great support for the amount of users that use it, easy to use gives you tools to properly manage the projects of the company as personal, The platform does not weigh as much as others in the market, its performance is great

Desventajas

the pdf preview is usually very slow and does not have a good performance and some problems with loading files. we hope to improve these faults

Paolo
Paolo
Calificación general
  • Sector: Consultoría de gestión
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Good for non-technical teams

Revisado el 22/5/2018

Better team management, who does what, very flexible board design, tracking of tasks across all...

Better team management, who does what, very flexible board design, tracking of tasks across all boards, etc

Puntos a favor

We do not need to track scrum speed or similar, and instead we need to get everybody on the same page on who does what, in a sparse team over multiple sites. Favro has some features that make it more desirable than its most famous competitors: duration of tasks, overview of a person's tasks over multiple boards, tracking of card age, two status of avatars (you can tag who is done on a card), etc. Really cool for team management when you grow to 5+ teams on 4+ sites and people working remotely!

Desventajas

Nothing bad for the moment, only a bit of an investment for a (non-American) startup budget. Customer support mark of 4 is like that only because we did not yet try it.

Sofia
Sofia
Calificación general
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Excellent app for the management of your projects and teams

Revisado el 16/5/2018

It is a good option for task management, with a nice and intuitive design, it is a very competitive...

It is a good option for task management, with a nice and intuitive design, it is a very competitive market but its service is good.

Puntos a favor

This relatively new application offers a very complete and attractive service for project management, has a very nice interface and its operation is very intuitive which helps a lot to implement and put into rapid production, because if your team has worked with methods agiles, it will be very easy to use this, has good tools and functionalities for an excellent management.

Desventajas

If you require complete management at the enterprise level you may lack features that you should complement with other applications, but you can perform the task acceptably

Jonathan
Jonathan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Música
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Our team is loving Favro - productivity unleashed!

Revisado el 10/11/2019

The experience has been great so far, loving it and would recommend to our business partners.

The experience has been great so far, loving it and would recommend to our business partners.

Puntos a favor

We started using this to track project progress within our team, and love the features. very easy to use and great interface.

Desventajas

I don't think there is anything we dislike about Favro. It's all good so far, and we will keep using it!

Natasha
Natasha
Calificación general
  • Sector: Administración gubernamental
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Friendly project manager

Revisado el 31/12/2018

Having a tool like this is so flexible in its use has facilitated the work of assigning and...

Having a tool like this is so flexible in its use has facilitated the work of assigning and following up projects, saving time and money in the management of productive activities of the company

Puntos a favor

It is a flexible and easy to use project manager, organizes the information in horizontal or vertical tables, you can follow up on the complete history of what has happened with the assignments and with the project in general.

Desventajas

The management of the cards on the board becomes difficult once you have several with a lot of information

Nylyoriam
Nylyoriam
Calificación general
  • Sector: Administración gubernamental
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Plan your day to day in the best way with this application

Revisado el 28/11/2018

It is a platform without many complications, using it in our projects in the short term has been a...

It is a platform without many complications, using it in our projects in the short term has been a great help, allows you to have a collaborative experience without so much stress and that guarantees effectiveness and compliance

Puntos a favor

You can organize and collaborate in a simple way, the interface is clean without much pretense, it gets the job for which it was created. On the board you can create and customize the cards for each project, you have access to a general overview of the tasks that have been completed throughout the execution time

Desventajas

It is a very simple application, as you progress in its use you feel that more tools should be added that allow you to get a better profit

Simon
Simon
Calificación general
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso

After much searching, and many trials, we chose Favro as it most closely supported our workflow

Revisado el 28/3/2018

Puntos a favor

Multiple boards in the same collection and sharing of cards between those boards. And the UX. And integrations.

Desventajas

Minor, but if I send a url of a card to a colleague, when they click it, they see only the card - they can't easily see which board it came from, so they lose context

Ivan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Práctica de la abogacía
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Welcoming software screaming to get hands-on

Revisado el 21/5/2018

The software can be used across departments connecting people and departments in a collaborative...

The software can be used across departments connecting people and departments in a collaborative platform. And it is very friendly to share the project progress during meetings.

Puntos a favor

Favro is friendly, super flexible and yet powerful when going skin deep. The system is built around super-customizable tasks called CARDS. CARDS can be connected to each other, or arranged hierarchically. CARDS can contain checklists like a list of subtasks, a list of languages to translate, whatever.
The CARDS can be grouped in BACKLOGS which are containers that will do for AGILE working styles but also for more traditional project management. They are not a Gantt chart yet I am pleased that I can have a list reflecting when the tasks (CARDS) have to happen, by whom, and grouped under project stages (for which I create a CARD one level up).
The approach is completed with BOARDS, a very Agile approach in which CARDS are placed in columns. Favro beats its competitors in that you can build as many columns as required with whatever labels. In example To-Do/Doing/Completed, or In analysis/Approved/In progress/Under testing/Ready/Closed, you choose. Favro strength is its flexibility, making it suitable for Marketing, a software development team, a Manufacturing company, Sales department, you name it. You can fit in any project.
To round off a CARD can live in more than one BACKLOG and one BOARD. This allows to make very powerful views on the tasks, like concurrently in a Dev team BOARD (To-Do/Doing/Completed) as the manager BOARD (Goals Q1/Goals Q2/Goals Q3) and yet still be one single task (CARD) maintained by all these roles. A BOARD can have more than one LANE i.e. for the

Desventajas

The obvious con of so much flexibility is that at first it is not clear what will be the best way to use it, and some users may even feel lost. Actually it could be easy to make a few bad choices in the start and find yourself with a hard to maintain collection of boards and backlogs. Also the flexible categorization can make searching for existing tasks (CARDS) a dark science scrolling through a long list in which you have to hope you found all the relevant CARDS, the alternative being to go to the full featured reporting system. Being a new contender in the category at the moment it lacks the expansive list of integrations that some of their competitors have, yet the frequent updates denote they will catch up quickly.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Very Reasonable and Useful Project Management Software

Revisado el 26/10/2018

Puntos a favor

I work with a team of people at the HR department. Although we handle different tasks and projects, there are some projects that we collaborate together. It’s important to find an app that has everything centralized in one system. This is where Favro comes to the picture. I was very happy to find this application which has very cheap monthly fees. I don’t even know where to start with the features, but this software allows you to brainstorm, track and plan ahead. You can use it on your phone and computer. The interface looks so cool and you can print out the reports of your projects.

Desventajas

It looks like a relatively new software that seems to be dynamic, but not all features can be used to its full potential. Better to not have many features but excel in what it can offer.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Better than trello, less complexed than jira, but can be improved,

Revisado el 17/5/2018

- Gives more clarity to team and org
- Providing separation of backlog and sprint goals increase...

- Gives more clarity to team and org
- Providing separation of backlog and sprint goals increase the productivity

Puntos a favor

- Two separate section really make the backlog and current sprint stories easy to maintain
- Separation also gives the clarity to the team, hence increase the team velocity
- Defining a template for each card is a pretty cool feature.
- Having integration with 3rd party softwares like slack, mail really makes easy to track stories

Desventajas

- Changing the estimation measure at one place changes at every place
- I dont like the new UI, lot of light colors, decreasing the contrast, can't differentiate between different cards easily
- There should be an easy option to get the address of the card, instead of clicking on the card and then copying the card link
- If u write something and accidentally u refresh page those changes are discarded automatically this should not be the case it can be improved

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Great enhancement to Trello-style Kanban with some unpolished edges

Revisado el 13/10/2018

It's a positive experience and so far I've used it for two projects I manage (invited 20+ co-workers...

It's a positive experience and so far I've used it for two projects I manage (invited 20+ co-workers to join). I hope the integration with other tools especially JIRA are even more thorough (it's functional right now, but not to a point I can just rely on that without manual touches)

Puntos a favor

Features. Features. Features. It's fully packed with features I dreamed of in Trello and now all available and even better. The visual style is appealing and the product itself is solid

Desventajas

There're some rough edges in how the web app is loaded in the browser. For large boards it takes a long pause, sometimes so long that I wonder if the board is empty.

The pricing is on the expensive side. Lack of a personal / individual plan is also unfortunate so I can't use that for both professional and personal projects.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Hospital y atención sanitaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Favro Provides Synergy with My Team

Revisado el 1/11/2018

Puntos a favor

My job involves working with other people on specific projects. Since we are occupied with other things besides our projects, we all need to set time to find a day to meet and just discuss our projects. I prefer to have a virtual whiteboard which allows us to post all our ideas and jot down notes on tasks needed. Favro software gives us a powerful synergy because we are engaged and focused. We are able to get the work done faster because of the features and service this software provides which means we can tackle more projects in the future.

Desventajas

When there are a lot of people using the program, it tends to run slower than usual. This needs to be improved because we use this program for our daily tasks.

Fredrik
Calificación general
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Trello built for real work.

Revisado el 28/11/2017

Puntos a favor

It's ease of use. It's a better version than a whiteboard and post its (and I don't say that lightly!). It gives our team the same flexibility to structure and re-structure how we organize our work for our current needs as a white board would, but with all the added benefits that delightful software brings. A+!

Desventajas

I don't have that many annoyances.

At the top of the list would proper two-way sync with JIRA, simply because of all the workflows associated with JIRA are awesome for so many things, except of doing actual work. I would absolutely love if I could get a synced backlog from JIRA, but keep the process of doing work and resolving tickets via Favro. That would honstely be my killer app because someone of the team has do to double work at the moment.

And please don't try to replicate JIRA:s features, embrace it instead.

Another, much smaller thing I would like is to automagically tag all cards in a backlog with a tag as soon as it's added to it. Would make it much easier to get a glance of what areas my team members are working on in the lanes themselves.

And better markdown support with syntax highlighting and such would be a welcome addition as well.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Música
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

User in a team on non-techies in a startup doing some workarounds to make favro fit

Revisado el 4/12/2017

I can asily filter out everyone else and focus on what I need to be doing.

I can asily filter out everyone else and focus on what I need to be doing.

Puntos a favor

Everyone's involved, and we are easily thrown into projects where we are needed. It is exact, to the point and a lot faster to set up tasks and projects than in Jira.

Desventajas

Recurring tasks is a big one for us. Currently we're just moving to the right in new Monthly columns. I like to actually have things checked off as done, but these cards just follow us month to month (which is what we need but doesn't give a sense of closure and also offsets a lot of features to measure our progress)

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Ropa y moda
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Just awesome

Revisado el 22/11/2018

I am much more organized

I am much more organized

Puntos a favor

- Love just LOVE that I can boards and backlog within the same page (The main reason I choose Favro)
- Mirroring tasks helps me and the team get make sure they can create their own dashboard
- Visually stunning

Desventajas

- the TO DO list. Just awful. It really sucks. I mean this is quick and easy fix. (Main reason I would NOT use Favro)
- Pricing. Minimum bundle is 5 subscribers!!!! Really? they would make so much more money by enabling smaller teams use Favro. (I now use Asana because of this)

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Great for people who need it visual

Revisado el 26/4/2018

I get a better overview. And I use it to remember what I am doing right now, and what comes next....

I get a better overview. And I use it to remember what I am doing right now, and what comes next. And to not forget unrelated tasks, that is assigned to me while I am cought up in another assignment.

Puntos a favor

I like that my tasks are more visual, and I have a lot of options to organize. The customer support is really good and instant. Favro is constantly working on their features, witch of course has pros and cons - but I feel that they really listen to feedback.

Desventajas

I'm a single user, and I am sure I am not using the full potential of the system. I might need to take a day to research how to better setup my whole workspace. I sometimes have problems with english being my second language and that I don't know a whole lot about productivity systems.

I wish I could get help with setting up the workflow. My needs does not seem to fit the templates.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Juegos de ordenador
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10

Good start, but many key features missing

Revisado el 22/3/2018

we have more freedom for our dev team. If we could have chosen, the CS team could have stayed...

we have more freedom for our dev team. If we could have chosen, the CS team could have stayed behind using kanban flow. Some improvements to the previous product but quite big minuses for the missing key features.

Puntos a favor

the backlogs in the tree mode are quite awesome. They give the possibility to minimise the backlogs to 'titles only' and then reserve room for the actual board.

Desventajas

Search works only for ticket titles and doesnt include the content of the ticket (Why oh why?) - very bad for searching that one ticket that you remember from few weeks ago.
there is no feature for tickets that could be created for recurring tasks (same content, with e.g. tickboxes) & they could be scheduled to appear at any given time and have a fixed due date) - I like it the least that so many of my favourite features are missing coming from kanban flow

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Marketing y publicidad
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Best Project Manager I've Found

Revisado el 22/10/2018

Having multiple people each with their own preferences of information organization all on one...

Having multiple people each with their own preferences of information organization all on one platform is a godsend!

Puntos a favor

Favro, while it has kind of a funny name, is the best PM I've found. Easy to use interface, but still allowing for a huge amount of customization. I love the card layout and am able to keep complex amounts of informations clean looking and well organized.

Desventajas

I wish the calendar view was directly editable for changing deadlines.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Very awesome app. This boost the productivity of my team.

Revisado el 17/4/2018

This is, for now, the perfect companion for my team. We use it every day.

This is, for now, the perfect companion for my team. We use it every day.

Puntos a favor

Ease of use. It's very quick to be in control. All of my staff are way more focus on objective. In the end I'm sure we save time ($$) using Favro.

Desventajas

A bit expensive for small business. Lack of option in many place. Workflow Rules are basic. We need more feature in this area. This Mobile version quand be a little tricky to use on Ipad and on Phone.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Telecomunicaciones
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Is software that can be improved for project management

Revisado el 19/1/2019

Puntos a favor

It is an excellent software for project management, it is based on easy to program multitasking cards that are structured in the organizations and goals carried out within the ongoing projects. Its interface is very easy to use at the user level, it only limits its functionality a bit.

Desventajas

In general terms it seems to me an excellent software but nevertheless has some cons at the moment of its functionality, among them is its difficulty to keep the pending works, this because in some occasions the alerts were not remembered in time, and it can only be work a certain amount of cards at a time. However, I think it can evolve and improve in the sense of solutions in the cloud, which would greatly facilitate its use and portability.

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Software informático
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Sorting feauture

Revisado el 16/10/2018

Good

Good

Puntos a favor

Tags, timeline, velocity chart, burn-down charts, integration with slack, assortment of formatted data like checklist, description, attachments. Easier to connect between user and tech stories

Desventajas

Unable to get charts based on tags filter. Try implementing as it would help create single board which captures all team effort rather than creating board feature wise