Lever

4,6 (642)
¡Escribe una opinión!
Plataforma de reclutamiento colaborativo

Calificación general

4,6 /5
(642)
Relación calidad-precio
4,4/5
Funcionalidades
4,3/5
Facilidad de uso
4,6/5
Asistencia al cliente
4,6/5

94%
de los usuarios recomienda esta aplicación
Ordenar por

642 opiniones

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

ágil, rápido y eficaz

Revisado el 12/12/2022

validar informacion de manera rapida y exitosa

validar informacion de manera rapida y exitosa

Puntos a favor

facil de usar sus recursos y eficaz en todo proceso

Desventajas

n/a, no tengo ningun inconveniente con dicho software

Nicole
Nicole
Calificación general
  • Sector: Arquitectura y planificación
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Smooth Transition

Revisado el 16/7/2024

[sensitive content hidden] was an excellent implementation specialist! He was knowledgeable,...

[sensitive content hidden] was an excellent implementation specialist! He was knowledgeable, patient, and always willing to go the extra mile to help us get up and running with the new system. We highly recommend him!

Puntos a favor

[sensitive content hidden] was an invaluable asset during our recent implementation process. His expertise in Lever was crucial in ensuring a smooth and successful transition.

[sensitive content hidden] patience and clear communication skills made the process much less stressful for our team. He was always available to answer questions and troubleshoot any issues that arose.

Desventajas

None whatsoever. Happy with Lever thus far.

Alternativas consideradas

Manatal y Greenhouse

Software anterior

Paycor
Briana
Calificación general
  • Sector: Capital riesgo y capital privado
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

[sensitive content hidden] is the best!!!

Revisado el 15/12/2023

Echoing what I shared above - Working with [sensitive content hidden]
was amazing - he is...

Echoing what I shared above - Working with [sensitive content hidden]
was amazing - he is extremely thorough, responsive, and made this a seamless process for us. We couldn't have gotten through the implementation without him!

Puntos a favor

Working with [sensitive content hidden]
- he is extremely thorough, responsive, and made this a seamless process for us. We couldn't have gotten through the implementation without him!

Desventajas

Nothing so far - really enjoying the product

Argenis
Argenis
Calificación general
  • Sector: Seguridad informática y de redes
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Prueba gratis
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

An essential ally for successful recruiters

Revisado el 11/7/2023

My experience has been highly satisfactory and positive. I have found in this platform a reliable...

My experience has been highly satisfactory and positive. I have found in this platform a reliable ally to optimize my recruitment process and effectively manage all stages of recruitment.

Puntos a favor

I love about this platform is its holistic approach to the hiring cycle. Not only does it have a complete applicant tracking system, but it also provides a clear and organized view of the entire process.

Desventajas

It is a very complete and effective platform for managing the hiring process, there are some aspects that could be improved. I would like to mention is that sometimes the workload can be a bit slow. This can be especially noticeable when working with a large number of candidates or looking to filter specific data.

Miguel
Calificación general
  • Sector: Petróleo y energía
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10

Lever implementation & first thoughts upon using the system

Revisado el 19/11/2024

The Implementation process has been great. [sensitive content hidden] has been a lot of help...

The Implementation process has been great. [sensitive content hidden] has been a lot of help answering all of our questions

Puntos a favor

The interview scheduling capabilities. Being able to reach out to multiple candidates for availability and schedule them seamlessly.

Desventajas

Hiring managers seem to be able to schedule an interview and it would be nice to be able to prevent certain users from scheduling interviews. Also I would like to be able to Bold candidate names again after they have already been viewed in the pipeline.

Russell
Calificación general
  • Sector: Cuidado de la salud mental
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

The best ATS

Revisado el 21/9/2023

By far the best ATS that I have used in 15 years of recruiting. The UI is intuitive, the ability to...

By far the best ATS that I have used in 15 years of recruiting. The UI is intuitive, the ability to manage your pipeline using is as easy as they come. The reporting is accurate and it is easy to identify what impacts and triggers. I did 15 demos before deciding on Lever. And after each Demo I felt like there were missing tools or a misalignment on what those ATS did vs what I believed was an effective way to manage candidates through the interview process. With Lever I felt like the softwares functionality matched with my philosophy on recruiting and the candidate experience.

Puntos a favor

Easy to customize, great bulk actions, strong reporting, and the best tool for managing your candidate pipeline.

Desventajas

The Easy Book tool lacks some customization. You can work around this through management of your calendar.

Alternativas consideradas

Jobvite, Workable y Greenhouse

Razones para cambiar a Lever

Levers focus on the candidate profile and the ability to manage your pipeline best allows me to manage candidates through the pipeline, providing a great candidate experience and never missing/ghosting candidates.
Danielle
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Great implementation!

Revisado el 15/12/2023

I want to mention our WONDERFUL Implementation Manager, [sensitive content hidden] has been so...

I want to mention our WONDERFUL Implementation Manager, [sensitive content hidden] has been so helpful during the implementation process and we are so thankful for all his support.

Puntos a favor

Ease of implementation, reporting functionality, general UI of platform.

Desventajas

Nothing really - it's been a great product to use so far

Vallery
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10

Lever ATS Review

Revisado el 20/9/2024

Overall, I have had a good experience with Lever, however, it leaves a lot to be desired compared...

Overall, I have had a good experience with Lever, however, it leaves a lot to be desired compared to the other more modern Applicant Tracking Systems out there.

Puntos a favor

I like Lever because of its ease of use.
It's also great for bulk candidate management, especially for those who handle volume roles.
It also has integration with a lot of job boards which leads to a good flow of applicants.

Desventajas

The reporting module is not the greatest, we have had to integrate it with another app for reports.
It also lacks a lot of automation, which can be a downside for busy recruiters.

Jessica
Calificación general
  • Sector: Salud, bienestar y deporte
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Super Smooth Lever Implementation

Revisado el 8/5/2024

Puntos a favor

[sensitive content hidden] provided THE BEST implementation experience. Migrating over to Lever came at a time when there was not a lot of time to devote to implementation projects, but he made the work feel managable, possible, and always a team effort. The layout of the implementation was always concise and clear, with all questions always answered with confidence and context. He was also always a joy to speak to and I always looked forward to the meetings. I couldn't recommend him enough.

Desventajas

If I had to nit pick, it would be the inability to customize interview buckets for each role.

Aimee
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

So Easy to Use!

Revisado el 11/4/2024

Overall happy with Lever. Seems to be able to do everything we need it to.

Overall happy with Lever. Seems to be able to do everything we need it to.

Puntos a favor

Lever is extremely easy to use. I like that you can see which opportunities the candidates are tied to in their candidate profiles. Moving candidates between stages is a breeze. I like the Chrome extension which has been quick and easy to add candidates to the system.

Desventajas

It seems more geared towards US hires and not international which is a bummer. I also don't like the fact that Lever doesn't have an electronic signing option for candidates. If you want that you have to add Adobe Sign or DocuSign which is another expense. Lastly, it would be really great if there was an option to have the interviews tab show all of the upcoming interviews that the Recruiting Coordinator has scheduled. Not just their own upcoming interviews.

Whitney
Calificación general
  • Sector: Marketing y publicidad
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Lever for the Win

Revisado el 25/4/2024

Our implementation and onboarding experience with Lever was fantastic. [sensitive content hidden]...

Our implementation and onboarding experience with Lever was fantastic. [sensitive content hidden] listened to everything that we had to say, whether it was pushing for updates, frustrations with understanding, or excitement around how improved our new system was. He was always willing to help us out, go above and beyond supporting us through emails, and follow up with items he didn't have an answer to right away. [sensitive content hidden] made the experience!

Puntos a favor

One of my favorite features is the job posting template. It is so easy to add the pieces that are part of each job posting and only have to worry about updating the details for the specific role.

Desventajas

Requesting candidate availability is not something that we can do (yet?) and it does make it difficult to collect that data. We are making it work the best we can until that is hopefully added to the roadmap.

P
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios financieros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Great tool

Revisado el 22/2/2024

Puntos a favor

Data & Analytics, East scheduling, Automations and lot custom options to make the system our own

Desventajas

User Permissions are a bit consuming and limiting

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Enjoyed Using

Revisado el 26/4/2023

Very positive. Implementation was very easy and the support team was great.

Very positive. Implementation was very easy and the support team was great.

Puntos a favor

I really enjoyed user Lever. It has tons of features for DE&I. Our managers loved using it as well and it really streamlined our recruiting efforts. Scheduling through the Office integration was also great.

Desventajas

Compared to others, Lever was pricey but we felt it was worth it. The software runs very smoothly, never had an issues, and was very easy to use. Top of our budget but we got what we paid for in my opinion.

Alternativas consideradas

Breezy, iCIMS Talent Cloud, JazzHR y Greenhouse

Razones para cambiar a Lever

We liked the user experience best. Seemed like the easiest to use and it had the most robust reporting when we demoed the product.
Sydney
Calificación general
  • Sector: Biotecnología
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Easy to configure ATS that provides a great candidate, recruiter, and hiring manager experience

Revisado el 17/3/2023

Puntos a favor

User interface is very intuitive and makes it easy to navigate. As a super admin, it's been very easy to configure/change/edit the settings in all facets. The global aspects of the company are very important from a data protection perspective along with the integration APIs. If you are a data person, you will love the visual insights as well. You can slice the data any way you need to and share automated reports on a cadence you define. The integration team was also incredible....they go above and beyond to figure out any roadblocks with integration and/or process specific needs that Lever doesn't readily support.

Desventajas

We are very strict with our security settings related to email and can't enable the approval processes just yet which is disappointing. Not Lever's fault, just the nature of our business setup. It has many features, but it could use a few more visual indicators in the candidate pipeline stages when multiple people are adding notes or giving a "thumbs up or down" while reviewing to make it easier to see if action has been taken on a candidate. It would also be nice to have sorting capabilities in the pipeline stages as well.

Alternativas consideradas

JazzHR, Workable y Greenhouse

Razones para elegir Lever

We were using the recruiting module in ceridian and it was clunky, not very efficient, and didn't allow good workflow/visual insights.

Software anterior

Dayforce HCM

Razones para cambiar a Lever

Contract terms, cost, customer service, configurability, ease of use
Ryan
Calificación general
  • Sector: Hospital y atención sanitaria
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Paramedic Service of Illinois - Great experience with Lever Team

Revisado el 26/6/2024

We had an excellent experience with [sensitive content hidden] our Account Rep from beginning to...

We had an excellent experience with [sensitive content hidden] our Account Rep from beginning to end (very attentive), and [sensitive content hidden] did a great job with our prep to Launch.

Puntos a favor

Ease of use. Integrations with Job boards.

Desventajas

Candidate texting ability did not come with our package.

Alternativas consideradas

Workable

Razones para elegir Lever

Careers Page was not attractive, Clunky ATS

Software anterior

ADP Workforce Now

Razones para cambiar a Lever

Slightly more affordable, more functionality
Alaina
Calificación general
  • Sector: Seguros
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Great Implementation with [sensitive content hidden]!

Revisado el 6/3/2024

So far, we have had a fantastic and smooth implementation process leading up to our go-live....

So far, we have had a fantastic and smooth implementation process leading up to our go-live. [sensitive content hidden]
willingness to go above and beyond to answer all of our questions (sometimes multiple times over) and make himself available whenever something came up made this a truly stress-free implementation. Anyone who has ever implemented a product will tell you, those words don't usually go together. Truly grateful for his outstanding customer service and guidance!

Puntos a favor

They have top notch customer service and a fantastic implementation process. Overall, the software fits our needs and is customizable enough that we can make it fit our processes and not the other way around.

Desventajas

Nothing major that stands out as a flaw with the tool. There are of course, features I would like to see added, but our implementation specialist [sensitive content hidden]
was fantastic at ensuring our feedback was submitted on the product whenever one of these changes came up!

Usuario verificado
Calificación general
  • Sector: Empleo y contratación
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Great ATS With Automation

Revisado el 31/1/2024

Puntos a favor

The automation features and native integrations to other software

Desventajas

Advanced data analytics requires a more expensive subscription

Kymmy
Calificación general
  • Sector: Construcción
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Implementation with [sensitive content hidden] was seamless

Revisado el 22/3/2024

Puntos a favor

The implementation process was seamless with [sensitive content hidden] as our specialist. All questions were answered in a timely fashion. The integration with Indeed & Paylocity was also seamless!

Desventajas

There are a few things that took a little longer to integrate, like texting.

Brett
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Lever Pro Services Team

Revisado el 31/8/2023

As a project manager, I am assigned 10-15 projects a year, and 80% of these include a professional...

As a project manager, I am assigned 10-15 projects a year, and 80% of these include a professional services engagement from a service partner like Lever. The professional services team led by [sensitive content hidden] was easily the best, smoothest, most competent engagement I’ve seen in years. Coming from a PS background myself, I know it’s tough to be in her role. But her rare combination of high organization, positive attitude and leadership style, product and process knowledge, ability to teach, and written and verbal communication was so effective that my role as client PM was limited to a few internal deliverables and resource gathering. A huge credit to the Lever team, we were able to kick off the project an implement in about 12 weeks, despite terrible delays on our side getting a contract together. This enabled our business leaders to still implement in Q2 as originally planned. [sensitive content hidden] also demonstrated tremendous professionalism and patience when I dropped a ball and she scrambled and accelerated her team to support us. On balance, our business community and we as a client overall were in truly strong, professional hands from start to finish, and our internal post mortem report lists “Lever Professional Services” as the #1 reason we thought the engagement went well. I’d recommend Lever software and professional services without hesitation of any kind to anyone.

Puntos a favor

Ease of use of the product and reports we got

Desventajas

Still have e-mail functionality to upgrade into

Allison
Calificación general
  • Sector: Servicios medioambientales
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Great Implementation

Revisado el 9/10/2023

Puntos a favor

The Lever ATS is so easy to use. The Lever Implementation is great to work with. Our Implementation Partner [sensitive content hidden]
was the outstanding. I have worked on other system implementations with other implementation partners, but Tom was the best.

Desventajas

Audit trail and a few other items that I discussed during the implementation.

Kyle
Calificación general
  • Sector: Banca
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Awesome ATS!

Revisado el 8/8/2023

In our search to implement a new applicant tracking system at our organization, we came across...

In our search to implement a new applicant tracking system at our organization, we came across Lever and were so excited about the platform and what we could do with it. One of our biggest wish list items was a system that not only would help us integrate different recruiting and onboarding processes for a more streamlined applicant journey, but also one that looked great and was easy to use. Lever had it all and the feedback we have received on it since implementing has been great! Lever helps us feel empowered to make changes as needed in the platform easily without getting lost in admin menus and various settings configurations that are so hard to replicate. It’s simple yet sleek and is honestly refreshing coming from our previous ATS. On top of all this, they have a wonderful team from implementation to support should we need to reach out on something. We definitely recommend Lever and hope you like it as much as we do!

Puntos a favor

Lever is an easy to use platform with a fresh look and feel from an admin and candidate perspective. Streamlined integrations with numerous other systems and a sync with our internal communication channels.

Desventajas

At this time there is nothing that we dislike about the platform.

Alternativas consideradas

Greenhouse

Software anterior

iCIMS Talent Cloud
Margot
Calificación general
  • Sector: Transporte/transporte en camión/ferrocarril
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
  • Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de un año
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Facilidad de uso
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

A great tool to promote upskilling and career development,

Revisado el 4/9/2023

I have used Lever as an employer and employee and it's a great tool.

I have used Lever as an employer and employee and it's a great tool.

Puntos a favor

Lever is a great tool to promote upskilling and career development. Its interface guaranteed a great visibility to all candidates looking for a new role or the next step in their career.

Desventajas

Lever is like most platform, you get the result proportionately to the efforts and information you put in. So make sure you give enough details for the platform to be useful to your employees.

Michelle
Calificación general
  • Sector: Aprendizaje en línea
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10

Attentive implementation

Revisado el 17/3/2023

The experience has been positive. Changing a new system can be very overwhelming. Lever goes the...

The experience has been positive. Changing a new system can be very overwhelming. Lever goes the extra mile to make sure your team is trained and taken care of. We had an amazing Implementation Specialist named [sensitive content hidden] who maintained a very friendly and positive disposition through out our months of training. He was very helpful and excellent representative of Lever. I

Puntos a favor

Love the interviews tab under "candidates". Its so easy to see who is in your pipeline. I also love the clock icon that lets you know when your candidate has gone cold.

Desventajas

Having the capability to have multiple Reqs for the same job title would be really helpful. Perhaps having the ability to add additional budget IDs would help solve this problem?

Ghayathri
Calificación general
  • Sector: Estudios de mercado
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
  • Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de dos años
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10

Cost-effective ATS for small to mid-stage companies - Lever

Revisado el 2/4/2023

Puntos a favor

Simple and effective, cost is affordable for growing organizations, and the way they price it based on employee count and not on a per-seat basis.

Desventajas

Reporting can be better, LinkedIn integration is a work in progress.

Alternativas consideradas

BambooHR

Razones para elegir Lever

Ease of usage

Software anterior

Gmail, BambooHR y Google Sheets

Razones para cambiar a Lever

Ease of usage, and the features are great.
Presley
Calificación general
  • Sector: Aprendizaje en línea
  • Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
  • Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
  • Fuente de la opinión

Calificación general

  • Relación calidad-precio
  • Facilidad de uso
  • Asistencia al cliente
  • Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10

Great Experience with Lever!

Revisado el 20/3/2023

Puntos a favor

Lever has been great so far! Really enjoying the system and how easy it is to keep track of candidates and reach out through the system.

Desventajas

Some of the fields aren't customizable when it comes to entering requisitions, which can be frustrating.