Opiniones de MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Calificación general
Filtrar
Tamaño de la empresa
Tiempo usado
571 opiniones
- Sector: Marketing y publicidad
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Anypoint platform un programa de desarrollo de sofware muy curioso
Revisado el 28/3/2023
Nuestra experiencia general con Anypoint platform ha sido muy satisfactoria, nos recomendaron este...
Nuestra experiencia general con Anypoint platform ha sido muy satisfactoria, nos recomendaron este software para desarrollar una pequeña aplicacion que necesitabamos en nuestra empresa, y con ella lo hemos conseguido de una manera rapida y sencilla. Como ya estabamos acostumbrados a trabajar con Java no nos ha sido muy complicado utilizar este software, ademas el poder utilizar la base de datos de Oracle, que para nosotros es una de las mas potentes, nos ha facilitado el trabajo.
Puntos a favor
Lo que mas me ha gustado del software es que el desarrollo de aplicaciones en esta plataforma no nos ha resultado muy complicado de utilizar. Hemos utilizado JAVA y ORACLE como motor de base de datos para el desarrollo de nuestra aplicacion y asi de una manera rapida y sencilla, hemos podido crear una pequeña aplicacion.
Desventajas
Su curva de aprendizaje puede ser un poco lenta si no has trabajado con ECLIPSE, y la atencion al cliente puede ser mejorable.
- Sector: Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante Prueba gratis
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10
Permite crear aplicaciones
Revisado el 22/12/2022
Puntos a favor
Me resulto interesante probar esta herramienta para diseñar , implementar automatizar, redes de aplicaciones
Desventajas
Si no tienes ciertos conocimientos de APIs te puede resultar dificil iniciarte en ella.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Excelentes expectativas
Revisado el 14/10/2022
Ha sido muy gratificante a nivel de usuariosy clientes
Ha sido muy gratificante a nivel de usuariosy clientes
Puntos a favor
Ha logrado satisfacer mis necesidades internas y la de mis clientes
Desventajas
Al día de hoy no existe detalle que impida el seguir utilizando este softaware
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
ESB for Enterprise Integration
Revisado el 27/3/2019
We have developed business solutions for a wholesale site to handle orders and trigger mailers.
We have developed business solutions for a wholesale site to handle orders and trigger mailers.
Puntos a favor
The best thing I liked about the software is its ease of use with version 3. Able to develop API solutions very quickly with a RAML file and the cloud hub deployments.
Desventajas
Documentation was missing few details for connectors. Also the limitations with community version was challenging to develop solutions which require transformations.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Best one to develop and deploy API and manage API using a single platform
Revisado el 12/4/2022
I have been using it for 1.7years it works efficiently and is easy to use and has lots of features...
I have been using it for 1.7years it works efficiently and is easy to use and has lots of features to explore
Puntos a favor
Raml design, exchange to publish the specs, runtime manager to manage deployed API
Desventajas
Design center acts weired sometimes, ask to use newer verify of raml while we self are are editing the the newer version
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10
AnypointStudio is good for quick development of integrating other systems and RESTful services.
Revisado el 7/6/2017
Quick integration of enterprise systems, legacy applications and thick client applications. Easy...
Quick integration of enterprise systems, legacy applications and thick client applications. Easy maintenance of APIs.
Puntos a favor
Quick development APIs using the API Manager and Anypoint studio, also quick configuration tools are provided by Mulesoft.
Desventajas
API Manager should be able to provide automatic customization of alerts. Undeployment of APIs and Mule ESB services are taking more time in MMC.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Best Integration Software development framework
Revisado el 18/11/2019
By far the best integration software platform i used in my 14 years of professional career. Easy to...
By far the best integration software platform i used in my 14 years of professional career. Easy to use and manageability of application is easy.
Puntos a favor
Easy to connect to various external systems such as database, File Systems etc.. We can use existing connectors to connect to various external systems instead of writing the code. Amount of time take to develop a application is relevantly less.
Desventajas
Support from the mule soft is not sufficient so far. we need to raise a case if we face a issue and average respond time from mulesoft folks is not fast as would expect. we have faced this problem couple of times in my office.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Cloud based integrated platform and middleware solution
Revisado el 24/5/2019
Puntos a favor
1. Mulesoft can be used to provide an integration platform to a large number of systems like Salesforce, ODBC, JDBC, SAP, Mongo DB, etc.
2. A large number of out of box connectors are available in the market place to be used.
3. Ability to write custom connectors to meet the integration needs of the client.
4. Excellent option to develop microservices and real-time integrations
Desventajas
Not as robust in handling large data volumes, Informatica is better in that respect.
- Sector: Comercio minorista
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10
Perfect Ipaas
Revisado el 13/9/2022
Puntos a favor
Anypoint platform give great way of develop API for your SI, it gives perfect monitoring tools, easy to use integration. the way they propose to have a 3 layer approach is quite nice to organize your API and have a clean architecture
Desventajas
The main issue is to find good developer to use it, it's difficult to make a developer of classical langage to use the platform, and it's a nightmare to find people who already new the platform
Alternativas consideradas
Boomi- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: Trabajador autónomo
- Software usado Otro durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Anypoint Is A Good Way To Go
Revisado el 18/7/2019
As I was implementing for a client, time to implement and getting a system up and running w/o...
As I was implementing for a client, time to implement and getting a system up and running w/o issues and cost were major issues. This product succeeded, and the client is quite pleased.
Puntos a favor
The ability to load and install for free with some support. The advanced integration and API approach for combining services and other products makes the product extremely useful and quick to test and implement without any financial commitment.
Desventajas
LIke any other free open-software package, when it works, it's fantastic. When it doesn't, or when you are trying to do something that doesn't seem like a common usage, it can seem like you're on your own. It can take a while, solutions can be found, but it can take some time.
- Sector: Contabilidad
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Great application programming solution
Revisado el 15/11/2022
If you master the environment alos it's an excellent tool
If you master the environment alos it's an excellent tool
Puntos a favor
application development solution. the solution allows to design, develop and test applications
Desventajas
Difficulty in mastering the development environment
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
This was the middleware used for a next-gen learning system
Revisado el 20/4/2018
This was the reason we could do what we did with real AI, machine learning, and hyper connected...
This was the reason we could do what we did with real AI, machine learning, and hyper connected api's.
Puntos a favor
The ESB is the centerpiece of our learning ecosystem. While not having a front end interface and requiring programming (API work), it's been a tremendous efficiency tool for us. If only we used it better!
Desventajas
It's pretty pricey and the service around it is also costly as that is the main upcharge for businesses who don't have a lot of programmers, etc.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
the most advanced integration platform
Revisado el 27/8/2019
Puntos a favor
the possibility to use/search and use connector implements by other
Desventajas
it is quite expensive, for small company is not the right tools
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Anypoint Platform is very good platform which i come across , it is ease to use and user...
Revisado el 8/9/2017
Few Advantages that Mule has over other products are :-
Mule has a large collection of different...
Few Advantages that Mule has over other products are :-
Mule has a large collection of different connectors to connect and integrate diverse systems. It is said like it can almost connect anything.
Mule is very lightweight and easy to use compared to other esb. Since it is mostly Java based, so, it becomes very easy to use and build custom components. Most important is that, Mule is a pure esb, where other products comes with other functionality and platforms and esb is one of the part of the product. (eg WSO2)
Mule is graphically based unlike most of other esb, where the flows are mostly configured in XML (Apache Camel or Spring integration)
Mule is less expensive compared to most of other products. Even community versions are available, which will not cost you anything.
Mule earlier had a problem of its small size of its community. But nowadays, Mule community is expanding like others.
Mule, as I mentioned is easy to use. for example, if you want to expose a web service and need to do various transformations with payload, you just need to concentrate on your java implementation classes or you Mule flow. Mule will take care of exposing the service to an endpoint and you don't need to write any code for that.
It also has wide range of transformer that will take care of transformation of your payload and also other functionality like orchestration, routing etc and will be easy for you to implement
There are more or less other advantages, you can explore more to get it .
More or less choosing an esb depends on your requirement and budget.
Puntos a favor
Data Mapping is the feature i like most in this software, there are many feature which are as follow are the best for my project.
Debugging suppor,APIkit
RAML Support
Desventajas
RAML Support,
we can import RAML files for your APIs that are managed in the Anypoint Platform by the API Manager and keep them in sync with the platform.While working with a RAML file, you can also view an embedded interactive API Console that's automatically built from the resources and methods described in your RAML.Handle complex data mappings and transformations through the Transform Message component, that leverages the powerful DataWeave language. This component allows you to create your transformations both through a simple drag and drop visual interface or by coding in DataWeave to unleash all of the language's potential.
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
MuleSoft Mapping with other Middleware Tools
Revisado el 26/1/2017
EAIESB is middleware Expertise Company. We have started with SeeBeyond, SRE, ICAN, Java CAPS 5,...
EAIESB is middleware Expertise Company. We have started with SeeBeyond, SRE, ICAN, Java CAPS 5, Oracle Fusion 10G, 11G and 12C, TIBCO 5.X and TIBCO 6.X.
We have considered Mulesoft as an open Source tool (after diminishing of OPEN ESB / Glassfish ESB).
In 2014 /15 we have chosen Mulesoft as our middleware tool in building Smart Cities project (Integration, IOT & Big Data). Considering the cost and features. We could deliver the POC and could not win the project.
Later in 2016, again we started looking into as various customers are looking for migrating existing environment to new product (simple migration (export and import) vs Re-Write) customers started asking for migration path for Mulesoft also.
Mulesoft latest features (API, Microservices, IOT) tools supported in building components helped us to add Mulesoft into our portfolio.
Having experience in migrating code from various technologies we have built best practices in migrating to Mule.
Best benefit we have seen in mule is the ease of building the custom connector for the use cases while migration.
When mapping with other technologies, we see more connectors in mule, but connectors have less features, but it does not limit /stopping migration.
We are happy to talk to the team and provide specific connectors we have built and use cases which demanded us to build them and contribute to the community.
Feel free reaching us vijay.reddy@eaiesb.com
Puntos a favor
-Connector Development Kit
Desventajas
-Fewer features in connectors but not source stopper
- Sector: Administración educativa
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Feature rich API management and deployment tool
Revisado el 21/11/2016
While the Anypoint Platform is a newcomer to API management tools, it still manages to be feature...
While the Anypoint Platform is a newcomer to API management tools, it still manages to be feature rich and offers a great deal of resources for both API development and deployment needs. As an ESB, it offers a plethora of connectors for making our various enteprise systems work with each other while exerting minimal effort to do so. The interface is extremely user friendly as both a developer, administrator and consumer of APIs.
Puntos a favor
- Intuitive user interface. It's extremely easy to locate API information and consume analytic information.
- Easy to do create new APIs via RAML.
- Fast and easy deployments and updates.
- Wide range of connectors.
Desventajas
- Customer support can be a bit slow and hard to reach.
- Developer Portals for APIs do not allow for much customization.
- If you manage a lot of APIs, it is hard to keep track and administer APIs since tables do not let you sort using API request date and other variables.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Can't beat Mule.
Revisado el 7/2/2022
Very good. Computer programming fundamental are no needed to start working in Mule. It is a...
Very good. Computer programming fundamental are no needed to start working in Mule. It is a graphical flow designer and rest is UI based.
Puntos a favor
n number of possibility in integration space considering its direct competitors.
Design Center is a mater stroke for creating API specification & API Manager(act as Gateway) which competitors doesn't have.
Graphical flow design which is easy to build and debug.
Desventajas
I don't see any because Mule fulfills much need integration needs
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Exceptional and Powerful transformation
Revisado el 21/4/2017
Faster development speeds. Unprecedented productivity. API-led connectivity to gain a competitive...
Faster development speeds. Unprecedented productivity. API-led connectivity to gain a competitive advantage. Enables developers to bridge applications together fast and hassle-free, allowing them to exchange data easily. The Mule run-time engine of Anypoint Platform brings together the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a quick path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
Puntos a favor
Light-weight.
Scaling down - quick point-to-point integrations.
To the Cloud - CloudHub.
Desventajas
Circular reference is wrongly interpreted during deployment, even though it will not result in loop.
- Sector: Mercados de capitales
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Excellent Product
Revisado el 16/3/2017
Mule is one of the tool and platform for java people to upgrade into technical skill. It is easy to...
Mule is one of the tool and platform for java people to upgrade into technical skill. It is easy to use and easy to work in any business workflow. This software is a lightweight Java-based enterprise service bus and integration platform that allows developers to connect applications together quickly and easily, enabling them to exchange data.
Mule allow user to connect more service in minimum time. We can easy customize any component base on requirement. We can easy used or create SOAP and Rest services. Mule is one platform which support RAML for restful services.
Puntos a favor
easily develop business flow and reuse with many system. it does not force any design constraints on the architect to deliver any message. its work on highly distributed environment.
Desventajas
created more thread over the application.
As per my experience, the performance of the application is not as much good.
- Sector: Banca
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Anypoint platform is centralized manager for everything. I loved the way it simply organized...
Revisado el 8/8/2017
I was able to create RESTful services easily/fast-paced.
Able to convert existing xml/json...
I was able to create RESTful services easily/fast-paced.
Able to convert existing xml/json formatted data to desired formats quickly without any issues. Fast, proactive, easy interface. But lacks in scalability. Could not implement robust service. Process archestration is difficult when requirement becomes difficult.
Puntos a favor
Simple, centralized, end to end web platform. Runtime manager, insights, logs, alerts, policies at single place. Only Flow designer is missing. Although it is included in latest version 4.0, should have come before.
Desventajas
Anypoint designer had some issues with IE, Mozilla. Runtime manager hangs. Reporting of flow analytics should be more in depth. API designer doesn't provide all the features of comparitive tools like swagger. Public portal design should have been more options oriented.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
It's extraordinary
Revisado el 24/8/2018
Puntos a favor
The user interface is very friendly, very complete this integration tool with all the options for setting up the raml, creation, exhibition and configuration of the API in addition to the part of statistics analysis incredibly useful for making business decisions.
Desventajas
Not all options are intuitive and it is a little uncomfortable to expose the API on the one hand and configure it on the other, it would be better if everything were available in a single section.
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Anypoint Platform Review!
Revisado el 10/12/2017
Puntos a favor
The freedom and options to connect any system / component using the Anypoint Platform. Can connect flat files and expose them as a Web Service! The system doing a "GET" using web service will never know what kind of language / platform they're dealing with. It's a consistent look and feel of REST and SOAP.
Desventajas
Design tools are in Eclipse and require a slight learning curve if you are new to the environment. Because portions of the product are open sourced, updates require careful regression testing.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 501-1.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
Mule ESB 3.8 Features and functionalities review by Naveen
Revisado el 7/9/2016
I have been using Mulesoft ESB for our Integration needs in the enterprise.
Anypoint Studio is...
I have been using Mulesoft ESB for our Integration needs in the enterprise.
Anypoint Studio is fabulous, it has so many connectors that helps your requirements to complete in time and with ease.
you have variety of components for each use case and also u get a great support from the developer forums and mulesoft dedicated support.
Mulesoft site has so much documentation about the feature and components available, they give you a clear idea of how to use effectively.
I recommend this as your one stop solution for all your integration needs, it also has various other features like EDI.
Puntos a favor
So many Connectors available already in the tool and also there is a scope for new connectors as it is a open source. This gives freedom to the developer to use them conveniently.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - High Fives!!
Revisado el 20/11/2020
Puntos a favor
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a great projectwhen working with API's.
Desventajas
There is nothing bad to say about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la opinión
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Great platform.
Revisado el 25/5/2017
This is great upgrade to SOA approach, implemented as it is envisioned i.e. API led conectivity is...
This is great upgrade to SOA approach, implemented as it is envisioned i.e. API led conectivity is the wave of future.
Puntos a favor
Paradigm shift. API led connectivity vs. monolithic solution. Network of APIs is the way to go, and with right design approach you can have APIs which you never have to change.
Desventajas
documentation some time is harder to find, compare to MicroSoft technologies where there are tons of examples and sample code, it is sometime hard to get your specific question answered.